Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-25-2007, 10:46 AM
cashstrapped cashstrapped is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: up north, UK
Posts: 138
Default thoughts here?

This situation has come a few times recently and im not sure what i should be doing here. ive been tending to squeeze by raising to around $7 but this seems to get far too many callers, Im pretty sure this should be a simple decision but im stuck as of what to do.

PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $0.50 BB (6 handed) Poker Stars Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: FlopTurnRiver)

MP ($22.55)
CO ($15)
Button ($34.60)
Hero ($91.90)
BB ($28.45)
UTG ($51.30)

Preflop: Hero is SB with A, Q.
UTG raises to $1.5</font>, MP calls $1.50, 1 fold</font>, Button calls $1.50, Hero.....
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-25-2007, 10:48 AM
Nemesis69 Nemesis69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: SPARTAAAA!
Posts: 1,129
Default Re: thoughts here?

I'm squeezing here. Make it $11 to go if your afraid you will get too many callers.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-25-2007, 10:51 AM
Silversurfer81 Silversurfer81 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 22
Default Re: thoughts here?

I raise a little bit more than pot pretty much everytime.
I dont think that you will get too many callers that way + you should have the best hand most of the time pf and should push your edge.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-25-2007, 11:20 AM
Milky Milky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 996
Default Re: thoughts here?

The only reason not to squeeze here (and you have to make a real raise, $7 is too small w/all the callers) is if the initial raiser is very tight w/his UTG raises. But generally I do raise big here.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-25-2007, 11:23 AM
STARSCREAM. STARSCREAM. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 167
Default Re: thoughts here?

9.50 sir.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-25-2007, 12:18 PM
genius55 genius55 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: finding my inner rock
Posts: 408
Default Re: thoughts here?

calling is an option i think. I reraise to 9, should get rid of most of em.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-25-2007, 12:22 PM
Profish2285 Profish2285 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 1,936
Default Re: thoughts here?

I think calling and squeezing both have their merits. Against an unknown utg raise I pretty much never 3 bet pf with AQ. I like to get a handle on their range before I do that. However, there is some dead money in this pot that you can pick up if you do it. But I also dont mind playing with your hand multiway, so I guess either way can really work.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-25-2007, 12:30 PM
bazooka87 bazooka87 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 596
Default Re: thoughts here?

Squeeeeeeeze, $9ish should do the trick. You really want to take it down here or get heads up, it's not going to play well multiway
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-25-2007, 01:31 PM
ShipitFMA ShipitFMA is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Getting my c-bets minraised
Posts: 2,486
Default Re: thoughts here?

Depending on UTG its a good squeeze, if UTG folds, they all fold (presuming your 3bet size is decent). Raise to around 8-9
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-28-2007, 05:34 PM
tntp45 tntp45 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3
Default Re: thoughts here?

call...

AQs is not strong enough to reraise with, especially out of position. Lets see a flop for a buck and a half and then move...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.