|
|
#1
10-20-2007, 03:21 AM
|
|||
|
|||
2-4 blind battle w/ flush draw
Full Tilt Poker
Pot Limit Omaha Ring game Blinds: $2/$4 6 players Converter Stack sizes: UTG: $250 UTG+1: $466 CO: $580.30 Button: $1140 SB: $396 hero: $413.40 Pre-flop: (6 players) hero is BB with A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 2[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 3 folds, <font color="#cc0000">SB raises to $12</font>, hero calls. Flop: 8[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] ($24, 3 players) <font color="#cc0000">SB bets $24</font>, hero calls. Turn: 9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] ($72, 3 players) <font color="#cc0000">SB bets $52</font>, <font color="#cc0000">hero raises to $168</font>, SB calls. River: T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] ($408, 3 players) SB checks, <font color="#cc0000">hero is all-in $209.4</font> 
|
|
#2
10-20-2007, 04:55 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2-4 blind battle w/ flush draw
I don't mind it, Pete. You've got the Q blocker for the straight and there's really only one hand that can call this - KK. TTxx would be retarded as it wouldn't have gone past the turn so unless he's got the 2nd nuts, he'll be finding this near impossible to call.
|
|
#3
10-20-2007, 09:12 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2-4 blind battle w/ flush draw
in my experience once they call the turn here, they are just never folding
|
|
#4
10-20-2007, 04:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2-4 blind battle w/ flush draw
[ QUOTE ]
in my experience once they call the turn here, they are just never folding [/ QUOTE ] This is the main reason I posted. I have generally found this too. If I had a PSB left in my stack I probably wouldn't have bothered firing the river at all. But with a half-psb, I'm getting a pretty good price on the bluff, and (maybe?) it looks stronger than a half-PSB when I have more chips behind.
|
|
#5
10-20-2007, 05:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2-4 blind battle w/ flush draw
You have to know this player too right? You didn't do this vs a complete unknown I take it?
|
|
#6
10-20-2007, 05:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2-4 blind battle w/ flush draw
[ QUOTE ]
You have to know this player too right? You didn't do this vs a complete unknown I take it? [/ QUOTE ] Not a ton of history, but I'd been playing with him for a couple hours and he was moderately loose-aggressive. I don't think a special read is all that necessary though.
|
|
#7
10-20-2007, 05:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2-4 blind battle w/ flush draw
whats SN of player involved?
|
|
#8
10-20-2007, 05:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2-4 blind battle w/ flush draw
[ QUOTE ]
I don't think a special read is all that necessary though. [/ QUOTE ] Alrighty. NH.
|
|
#9
10-20-2007, 06:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2-4 blind battle w/ flush draw
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I don't think a special read is all that necessary though. [/ QUOTE ] Alrighty. NH. [/ QUOTE ] I didn't mean to suggest that it was necessarily a good play, or that the character of opponent isn't important. Just that I don't think the reasoning (whether right or wrong) is based on anything particularly obscure about the opponent's style.
|
|
#10
10-20-2007, 06:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2-4 blind battle w/ flush draw
[ QUOTE ]
whats SN of player involved? [/ QUOTE ] IllusionMan edit: fwiw, I have him at 26/10/2.3 in pokertracker. i didn't have a HUD running at the time and I thought he was a little more laggy.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
