#1
|
|||
|
|||
Juries: Yes or No?
This has come up a couple times now, so I thought I'd polltard. What do you think of the jury system? If abolish, what would you rather see? One judge? Panel of judges? Judges + court experts? What?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Juries: Yes or No?
I have been assimilated.
Private arbitrators. (Although, like JLP, I feel like there's a possibility the implants might come out with further reading [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] ) (If you just wanted to improve the current state run system then professional jurors or one judge) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Juries: Yes or No?
Actually I like the idea of having my lawyer, who is really sharp, has studied for years, and can convince anyone why black is white at the drop of a hat, explain to people too dumb to get out of jury duty why I have done nothing wrong.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Juries: Yes or No?
[ QUOTE ]
I have been assimilated. Private arbitrators. [/ QUOTE ] Private arbitrators could field juries. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Juries: Yes or No?
Juries for criminal, just a judge for civil.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Juries: Yes or No?
Make arbitration an aspect of the market, just like everything else should be.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Juries: Yes or No?
[ QUOTE ]
Make arbitration an aspect of the market, just like everything else should be. [/ QUOTE ] K, but what's your preference in a market trial? Arbitrator who fields juries? Or one who doesn't? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Juries: Yes or No?
[ QUOTE ]
Juries for criminal, just a judge for civil. [/ QUOTE ] I think I know why, but what's the reason for your distinction? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Juries: Yes or No?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Make arbitration an aspect of the market, just like everything else should be. [/ QUOTE ] K, but what's your preference in a market trial? Arbitrator who fields juries? Or one who doesn't? [/ QUOTE ] I have no meaningful way to express my preference, because it's a monopoly. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Juries: Yes or No?
Sigh. Imagine.
|
|
|