Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Business, Finance, and Investing
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10  
Old 11-29-2007, 08:19 PM
smbruin22 smbruin22 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,524
Default Re: EBITDA

the answer is basically what someone already said....

it's just quality of information. and moderate adjustments.

my guess is munger doesn't like the fact companies have very negative earnings but then say their EBITDA is positive (or even better, positive on a pro-forma basis). my own guess is he doesn't like the shenanigans companies go thru to get to a pro-forma EBITDA....

Buffet and munger i think look more at cash flow, which is harder to manipulate. less chance to play around with accrual accounting and other non-cash items. cash flow isn't perfect either. but it's probably better.

lampert and co look at EBITDA but i would think they dig into the #'s quite aggressively and look at the quality of things.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.