#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL200, I\'m kinda lost with this one....
He raises UTG then cold calls a re-raise and check min-raises you on the flop. I don't see any fold equity whatsoever and you could be drawing only to your diamonds, why shove when you're getting the correct odds to see a turn card?
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL200, I\'m kinda lost with this one....
[ QUOTE ]
He raises UTG [/ QUOTE ] He's 38/19. So this means he has 2 cards, basically. They might be suited though. [ QUOTE ] then cold calls a re-raise [/ QUOTE ] "Sweet, that dude has advertised his big hand, and he'll never put me on 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]! [ QUOTE ] and check min-raises you on the flop. [/ QUOTE ] Again, an AF of 8 means that this guy basically never check-CALLS. [ QUOTE ] I don't see any fold equity whatsoever and you could be drawing only to your diamonds, why shove when you're getting the correct odds to see a turn card? [/ QUOTE ] This guy could easily have JJ, or KJ/KQ, or 99. We are very rarely drawing to ONLY 9 outs. The Ace is often good. Sometimes the Q is too. Sometimes we are a 2:1 favorite. But we are NEVER less than ~ 3:1 |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL200, I\'m kinda lost with this one....
shove it and love it baby.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL200, I\'m kinda lost with this one....
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Easy call I think...not only is your FE low, but it's very likely you're drawing to 9 outs [/ QUOTE ] So you've narrowed down his hand to AK, 66, 55, 65, and KK? WTF? [/ QUOTE ] AA, KK, AK, QQ-55. You're probably adding 78 and diamonds in there, but I really don't think it's correct. I don't think he's minraising with those hands. I suppose thats villain's complete range, but imo it's heavily weighted towards hands that dominate us. Again, I don't think we have FE here, we're pushing into a situation where we are 50/50 at best, 25/75 at worst. It just doesn't make sense to me when calling gives great odds |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL200, I\'m kinda lost with this one....
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Easy call I think...not only is your FE low, but it's very likely you're drawing to 9 outs [/ QUOTE ] So you've narrowed down his hand to AK, 66, 55, 65, and KK? WTF? [/ QUOTE ] AA, KK, AK, QQ-55. You're probably adding 78 and diamonds in there, but I really don't think it's correct. I don't think he's minraising with those hands. I suppose thats villain's complete range, but imo it's heavily weighted towards hands that dominate us. Again, I don't think we have FE here, we're pushing into a situation where we are 50/50 at best, 25/75 at worst. It just doesn't make sense to me when calling gives great odds [/ QUOTE ] if you think its weighted towards the hands that dominate (AA, KK, AK) then why do we have great calling odds? $33 into a pot of about $86 isnt that about 3-1 but were 4-1 to hit our flush? since we would only have diamonds if were dominated or behind at the moment. please explain |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL200, I\'m kinda lost with this one....
prob shove, or maybe not quite a shove (focing him to shove over me for his last $30 or whatver) because I think shoving here advertises our hand as what it is, and a smaller raise looks like we're trying to keep him in, thus perhaps giving us more fold equity? if that makes no sense then drugs are bad.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL200, I\'m kinda lost with this one....
cc is terrible I think. We are sure to face a huge bet on the turn and we fold the best hand a lot. Besides, he probably min-raised to "see where he's at" with something gay like TT.
Shove. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL200, I\'m kinda lost with this one....
delta why does a shove advertise our hand as a draw? are you not shoving AA/KK/AK here?
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL200, I\'m kinda lost with this one....
[ QUOTE ]
$33 into a pot of about $86 isnt that about 3-1 but were 4-1 to hit our flush? since we would only have diamonds if were dominated or behind at the moment. please explain [/ QUOTE ] The pot is not $86. We're getting like 5-1 |
|
|