Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #751  
Old 11-05-2007, 12:12 PM
bills217 bills217 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: taking DVaut\'s money
Posts: 3,294
Default Re: 2007 SEC Football Thread

[ QUOTE ]
Kentucky @ Vandy - Under the radar game, but both teams desperately need the W to avoid spoiling all the good will they got from their recent upset wins.

[/ QUOTE ]

Don't look now, but a Kentucky win + SC win over Florida = Kentucky controlling their own destiny in the East again...although I don't think we'll win at UGA (at least not anymore).

Lumpkin getting hurt is the best thing that could have possibly happened to UGA. Moreno is like the Adrian Peterson of college. How he wasn't getting 90% of the carries before is beyond me.
Reply With Quote
  #752  
Old 11-05-2007, 01:20 PM
mmbt0ne mmbt0ne is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Back in ATL
Posts: 12,169
Default Re: 2007 SEC Football Thread

[ QUOTE ]
Lumpkin getting hurt is the best thing that could have possibly happened to UGA. Moreno is like the Adrian Peterson of college. How he wasn't getting 90% of the carries before is beyond me.

[/ QUOTE ]

Whoa there killer. He's played against a 2nd string Florida line and Troy so far. He's obviously good but let's not go TOO crazy just yet.
Reply With Quote
  #753  
Old 11-05-2007, 04:05 PM
ChipWrecked ChipWrecked is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: \"You been drinkin\', Santa?\"
Posts: 6,311
Default Re: 2007 SEC Football Thread

[ QUOTE ]
ChipWrecked- Aren't you an Arky fan? You should know the Ark/SC game was the ESPN game. That was CBS.



[/ QUOTE ]

[img]/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img]

I was watching at the casino.
Reply With Quote
  #754  
Old 11-05-2007, 05:40 PM
Ballzack Ballzack is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 83
Default Re: 2007 SEC Football Thread

It's amazing to read all the LSU hate here.

Does anyone even realize how good you have to be to play like complete dog [censored] for one half of every game against top 25 teams and still come out a winner. Of course, except for Kentucky.

They've been a second half team since trailing at half time to Tulane. The only exception was this week against Bama, they played in the first and fourth quarters.

If they play a complete game they blow any team in the country out of the stadium.

Continue the hate now.
Reply With Quote
  #755  
Old 11-05-2007, 05:45 PM
UATrewqaz UATrewqaz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 5,542
Default Re: 2007 SEC Football Thread

Playing an incomplete game on a regular basis is a sign of a bad team.

Or at least a badly coached team.
Reply With Quote
  #756  
Old 11-05-2007, 06:18 PM
TomCollins TomCollins is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Approving of Iron\'s Moderation
Posts: 7,517
Default Re: 2007 SEC Football Thread

[ QUOTE ]
It's amazing to read all the LSU hate here.

Does anyone even realize how good you have to be to play like complete dog [censored] for one half of every game against top 25 teams and still come out a winner. Of course, except for Kentucky.

They've been a second half team since trailing at half time to Tulane. The only exception was this week against Bama, they played in the first and fourth quarters.

If they play a complete game they blow any team in the country out of the stadium.

Continue the hate now.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think anyone on this board has doubted their talent one bit. You aren't going to win many championships with inconsistently performing top talent. Last year LSU was arguably the most talented team in the country, and they ended up with 2 losses. They are extremely lucky they aren't in the same boat this year.
Reply With Quote
  #757  
Old 11-05-2007, 06:25 PM
Ballzack Ballzack is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 83
Default Re: 2007 SEC Football Thread

I agree with both of you completely.

I hold Les Miles totally responsible for creating an atmosphere the allows players like Perrilloux to act retarded and Tyson Jackson to continue to put his team at risk with stupid penalties.

I aslo hold Bo Pelini responsible for making a tremendous defensive into a shell of what it once was. Sometime right before the Florida game he decided to stop blitzing as much and start running some weak ass zone. His players were recurited to play man to man not zone. He's taken them out of their element and they are getting toasted because of it.

I hope playing a couple of powder puffs in the new few weeks get their [censored] together before Arkansas and the SEC championship.
Reply With Quote
  #758  
Old 11-05-2007, 10:30 PM
TruFloridaGator TruFloridaGator is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Boomer Sooner
Posts: 10,871
Default Re: 2007 SEC Football Thread

gogogo Sec east 6 way tie!
Reply With Quote
  #759  
Old 11-06-2007, 02:17 PM
pvn pvn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: back despite popular demand
Posts: 10,955
Default Re: 2007 SEC Football Thread

[ QUOTE ]
Playing an incomplete game on a regular basis is a sign of a bad team.

Or at least a badly coached team.

[/ QUOTE ]

QFT. This is why Bama fans are all hoping Lloyd Carr keeps his job. It's also why LSU fans are so bitter about the Nick Saban situation. You don't see any Bama fans who are mad at Fran for leaving in the middle of the night.

Let's face it: Les Miles is an incredible luckbox on a big heater right now. He's got the talent, which helps a lot in getting lucky breaks to fall your way, but in Sklansky Wins this season (given the coachind decisions made), his team is probably 6-3.
Reply With Quote
  #760  
Old 11-06-2007, 06:13 PM
MyTurn2Raise MyTurn2Raise is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Evolving Day-By-Day
Posts: 18,508
Default Re: 2007 SEC Football Thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
It's amazing to read all the LSU hate here.

Does anyone even realize how good you have to be to play like complete dog [censored] for one half of every game against top 25 teams and still come out a winner. Of course, except for Kentucky.

They've been a second half team since trailing at half time to Tulane. The only exception was this week against Bama, they played in the first and fourth quarters.

If they play a complete game they blow any team in the country out of the stadium.

Continue the hate now.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think anyone on this board has doubted their talent one bit. You aren't going to win many championships with inconsistently performing top talent. Last year LSU was arguably the most talented team in the country, and they ended up with 2 losses. They are extremely lucky they aren't in the same boat this year.

[/ QUOTE ]


yep...as TomCollins has kind of pointed out, I don't think you'll find anyone who thinks more of LSU's talent and potential than I do. Hell, I still think they were the 'best' team last year and I still think they are the 'best' team this year. I'm also very partial to LSU as I fell in love when I visited the place and saw how truly passionate the fans are. Plus, I almost adopted the team when I almost moved to New Orleans. However, they are not 'deserving' of a national title shot right now. Ohio State, Kansas, and Oregon all are more deserving. A few might be close to as deserving. LSU still has time to change my mind, but, at a certain point, it shouldn't take all those close wins.
LSU is trying to mimic Ohio State 2002. Well, that team was much less talented and did not lose during the regular season (although they did tie if there wasn't a complete [censored] call at Champaign).

The only argument for LSU in the title game is their 'potential' and opinion that they are the 'best' team. Might as well scrape everything earned on the field.

oops..second argument is the SEC is so good that their champ deserves to play for the national title every year.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.