|
|
#61
10-26-2007, 11:20 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: (LC) Your Nemesis and Your Biatch
[ QUOTE ]
Woo hoo... I'm not one anyone's "biatch" list. [/ QUOTE ] That just means we get owned by random donks I think. 
|
|
#62
10-26-2007, 11:30 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: (LC) Your Nemesis and Your Biatch
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Woo hoo... I'm not one anyone's "biatch" list. [/ QUOTE ] That just means we get owned by random donks I think. [/ QUOTE ] Heh, we spread our loses out, or so I like to think. Of course, I probably don't play enough hands to get that many chances to give my money away.
|
|
#63
10-26-2007, 11:41 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: (LC) Your Nemesis and Your Biatch
I love this thread. Hadn't really used that window in PT before.
When combined with the "FTP Regulars" thread, it was very enlightening... to say the least. I am keeping a running list of playahs from that thread. When I compared the two, I found I was up A LITTLE (under $100) on just about all of them. What was more eye opening for me was that my nemesis' were considered weaker players. Even the bots own me [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img] So what does it mean when I'm ahead/even with the better players, but losing to the "fish"???
|
|
#64
10-26-2007, 12:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: (LC) Your Nemesis and Your Biatch
[ QUOTE ]
I love this thread. Hadn't really used that window in PT before. When combined with the "FTP Regulars" thread, it was very enlightening... to say the least. I am keeping a running list of playahs from that thread. When I compared the two, I found I was up A LITTLE (under $100) on just about all of them. What was more eye opening for me was that my nemesis' were considered weaker players. Even the bots own me [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img] So what does it mean when I'm ahead/even with the better players, but losing to the "fish"??? [/ QUOTE ] it means you're a bad player and you're running good.
|
|
#66
10-26-2007, 12:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: (LC) Your Nemesis and Your Biatch
[ QUOTE ]
I love this thread. Hadn't really used that window in PT before. When combined with the "FTP Regulars" thread, it was very enlightening... to say the least. I am keeping a running list of playahs from that thread. When I compared the two, I found I was up A LITTLE (under $100) on just about all of them. What was more eye opening for me was that my nemesis' were considered weaker players. Even the bots own me [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img] So what does it mean when I'm ahead/even with the better players, but losing to the "fish"??? [/ QUOTE ] Under the assumption that you trust your stats then you probably tend to adjust properly to better players than you do against worse players.
|
|
#67
10-26-2007, 12:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: (LC) Your Nemesis and Your Biatch
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I love this thread. Hadn't really used that window in PT before. When combined with the "FTP Regulars" thread, it was very enlightening... to say the least. I am keeping a running list of playahs from that thread. When I compared the two, I found I was up A LITTLE (under $100) on just about all of them. What was more eye opening for me was that my nemesis' were considered weaker players. Even the bots own me [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img] So what does it mean when I'm ahead/even with the better players, but losing to the "fish"??? [/ QUOTE ] it means you're a bad player and you're running good. [/ QUOTE ] too eazy, You have some logical thinking errors.
|
|
#68
10-26-2007, 04:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: (LC) Your Nemesis and Your Biatch
[ QUOTE ]
So what does it mean when I'm ahead/even with the better players, but losing to the "fish"??? [/ QUOTE ] For the most part I'd expect regulars to top both of your lists because you don't play enough hands with any single player to get anywhere close to a convergent result for your win/loss rate against them, and by playing so many more hands with the regs than the fish you'll randomly have larger total losses and wins with the regs. Your largest nemeses being fish are probably mostly the result of getting coolered a couple times each... play more hands [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
|
#69
10-26-2007, 04:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: (LC) Your Nemesis and Your Biatch
Good thread - NL200
I eliminated the couple of people I only had a couple of hands against that I decided to hand my stack to. Bitches ------- Pumuckel1 IKA258 GoPapiGo Nemesis ------- SobraoBoy AmPHisbaenA blunty31
|
|
#70
10-26-2007, 05:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: (LC) Your Nemesis and Your Biatch
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] just checked mine and i am (rounded cuz im lazy) +$5300 vs aquama +$3900 vs reynoldsXo +$3600 vs martine23 -$3k to )tiltem( -$2900 to 20buckspin -$1700 to empiremaker2 (who one outed me for a 400bb+ pot) [/ QUOTE ] That's weird...I have played with aquama lots in the micros. Last time was 25NL in July. Perhaps he/she won a tourney and donked it off at higher stakes than he/she was ready for?! [/ QUOTE ] Yeah me too. I have 5K hands with them at NL25 and have played with them everyday for the last 3 months or so. [/ QUOTE ] yeah i actually sharkscoped and looked up his MTT results just because of how bad he plays. He hasnt won anything in tourneys, apparently he put a couple thousand online and ran really really hot at 5/10 for a couple days. For the week or so he was playing that high i would leave stars open 24/7 and search for him like every 15-20 mins unless i was sleeping. Then i went to the bahamas w/ his money and when i came back he was playing 25NL [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] . Dealt to futuredoc85 [8c Js] tiger1001: folds sugarboy60: folds DuyTheMaster: folds knockstiff: folds aquama: raises $40 to $60 futuredoc85: calls $40 *** FLOP *** [3s 5c 8s] aquama: bets $100 futuredoc85: calls $100 *** TURN *** [3s 5c 8s] [3c] aquama: bets $225 futuredoc85: calls $225 *** RIVER *** [3s 5c 8s 3c] [3h] aquama: checks futuredoc85: bets $1675 and is all-in aquama: calls $765 and is all-in *** SHOW DOWN *** futuredoc85: shows [8c Js] (a full house, Threes full of Eights) aquama: mucks hand futuredoc85 collected $2297 from pot *** SUMMARY *** Total pot $2300 | Rake $3 Board [3s 5c 8s 3c 3h] Seat 1: knockstiff (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 2: aquama (small blind) mucked [4c Ah] Dealt to futuredoc85 [7s 7d] aquama: calls $20 futuredoc85: raises $60 to $80 tiger1001: folds sugarboy60: folds DuyTheMaster: folds knockstiff: folds aquama: calls $60 *** FLOP *** [6h 4d 6d] aquama: checks futuredoc85: bets $140 aquama: calls $140 *** TURN *** [6h 4d 6d] [7h] aquama: checks futuredoc85: bets $300 aquama: raises $310 to $610 and is all-in futuredoc85: calls $310 *** RIVER *** [6h 4d 6d 7h] [Kh] *** SHOW DOWN *** aquama: shows [4c Ac] (two pair, Sixes and Fours) futuredoc85: shows [7s 7d] (a full house, Sevens full of Sixes) futuredoc85 collected $1687 from pot Dealt to futuredoc85 [Qs Qh] aquama: raises $23 to $33 futuredoc85: raises $67 to $100 aquama: calls $67 *** FLOP *** [Js 8c Kc] futuredoc85: checks aquama: checks *** TURN *** [Js 8c Kc] [7c] futuredoc85: bets $140 aquama: calls $140 *** RIVER *** [Js 8c Kc 7c] [9c] futuredoc85: checks aquama: checks *** SHOW DOWN *** futuredoc85: shows [Qs Qh] (a pair of Queens) aquama: mucks hand futuredoc85 collected $479 from pot *** SUMMARY *** Total pot $480 | Rake $1 Board [Js 8c Kc 7c 9c] Seat 4: aquama (button) (small blind) mucked [8d 3d]
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
