|
|
#1
09-27-2007, 05:59 AM
|
|||
|
|||
How lose do you have to be described as a LAG anymore?
When did anything under 35/25/4 become TAG? Can someone explain what I missed where LAGs no longer exist?
|
|
#2
09-27-2007, 06:18 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: How lose do you have to be described as a LAG anymore?
Great thread.
|
|
#3
09-27-2007, 06:32 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: How lose do you have to be described as a LAG anymore?
I think it happened on august 19th
|
|
#4
09-27-2007, 06:41 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: How lose do you have to be described as a LAG anymore?
Nowadays lag is everything looser than 20/15 it seems.
|
|
#5
09-27-2007, 08:59 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: How lose do you have to be described as a LAG anymore?
I see where you're going at, although some people are mocking you [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] The games have become so much more aggressive, for instance everyone are 3-betting very loose compared to the old standards.
|
|
#6
09-28-2007, 01:11 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: How lose do you have to be described as a LAG anymore?
I'm actually very much unclear of if I see a hand history with just a generic description of the villain (e.g., nit, TAG, LAG, aggro donk) but no stats what stats should I have in mind for that villain.
E.g., nit ~= 15/9 ? TAG ~= 20/16 ? LAG ~= 25/20 ? aggro donk ~= 38/25 ? Something like that?
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
