|
|
#11
10-26-2007, 03:53 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Another horrible turn card.... <sigh>
[ QUOTE ]
my god, russ, you must be running really bad to be posting such a simple hand. [/ QUOTE ] haha yes. Last 6500 hands: VPIP 16.7, W$SD 47%. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] Thanks for the responses. Sorry to bore the forum. I also turbomucked the river... both of these shmoes had raggedy 10s for a straight. I don't think I've ever lost so little with a set of jacks... 
|
|
#12
10-26-2007, 10:07 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Another horrible turn card.... <sigh>
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] my god, russ, you must be running really bad to be posting such a simple hand. [/ QUOTE ] haha yes. Last 6500 hands: VPIP 16.7, W$SD 47%. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] Thanks for the responses. Sorry to bore the forum. I also turbomucked the river... both of these shmoes had raggedy 10s for a straight. I don't think I've ever lost so little with a set of jacks... [/ QUOTE ] Well, if you play it like a wuss, you would also be saying "I don't think I've ever won so little with a set of jacks..."
|
|
#13
10-26-2007, 12:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Another horrible turn card.... <sigh>
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Alright, everyone here is going to advocate betting (as do I, 97% of the time), but for whatever reason I got MUBS and checked. River: Ad SB bets, UTG raises, I? [/ QUOTE ] Turbomuck. You think a set is good here on a flush board where any T makes a straight and there's a river bet and raise? P.S. -- to Goober... you say the 9 would be a worse card if it completed an open-ender and not a gutshot, but actually AT had an "open-ender" here (double-gutted, but still an 8-out straight draw) where any K or 9 was good. [/ QUOTE ] KT would also be open-ended. Agree with the turbo-muck on the river.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
