Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Business, Finance, and Investing
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 07-06-2007, 01:34 PM
DcifrThs DcifrThs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Spewin them chips
Posts: 10,115
Default Re: First good idea

[ QUOTE ]
alright, I have permission to post the ticker. We are all full. Ticker is dsup.

Krishan

[/ QUOTE ]

what is your average cost per share?

Barron
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 07-06-2007, 01:34 PM
CrushinFelt CrushinFelt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,071
Default Re: First good idea

Looks like it's up about 33% since this thread started, though you're probably averaged in a bit. How long of a hold is this considered.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 07-06-2007, 01:38 PM
krishan krishan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: investing
Posts: 7,910
Default Re: First good idea

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
alright, I have permission to post the ticker. We are all full. Ticker is dsup.

Krishan

[/ QUOTE ]

what is your average cost per share?

Barron

[/ QUOTE ]

12.42

I think SM has a lower average as he didn't buy after our visit like I recommended.

Krishan
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 07-06-2007, 01:41 PM
krishan krishan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: investing
Posts: 7,910
Default Re: First good idea

[ QUOTE ]
Looks like it's up about 33% since this thread started, though you're probably averaged in a bit. How long of a hold is this considered.

[/ QUOTE ]

SM has no tax shelters so he really tries to get long term on all of his significant position. Currently I feel good through 2008. I will be covering this stock and will stay on top of results.

I personally think the short term (Q2 reporting) 2 months looks very strong. I took a slightly larger position as a short term trade in a tax deferred account.

Krishan
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 07-06-2007, 01:44 PM
CrushinFelt CrushinFelt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,071
Default Re: First good idea

No option chain. Booooooo.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 07-06-2007, 01:45 PM
CrushinFelt CrushinFelt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,071
Default Re: First good idea

12.42?? It hit that price early June. You waited that long?
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 07-06-2007, 01:59 PM
krishan krishan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: investing
Posts: 7,910
Default Re: First good idea

[ QUOTE ]
12.42?? It hit that price early June. You waited that long?

[/ QUOTE ]

No I bought at 14.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 07-06-2007, 02:00 PM
CrushinFelt CrushinFelt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,071
Default Re: First good idea

Skimming through their financials I don't see much that I really like. Care to delve in at all into what makes this your "First good idead"?

Edited to add: You must really like it for some reason as it's up the 33% since the Q1 call...
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 07-06-2007, 02:04 PM
krishan krishan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: investing
Posts: 7,910
Default Re: First good idea

[ QUOTE ]
Skimming through their financials I don't see much that I really like. Care to delve in at all into what makes this your "First good idead"?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah you can't look at this historically and get much of a feel for whats really happening. It's a turnaround where a lot was broken and a material amount has been fixed. The thesis revolves around GM improvement in the product segment improving dramatically. Management has guided to 1-2% per year but has talked about "smashing" that target. Q1 is seasonally weak (and up against a tough comp yoy) and they showed huge margin improvements.

Krishan
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 07-06-2007, 07:23 PM
Scorpion Man Scorpion Man is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 615
Default Re: First good idea

[ QUOTE ]
12.42?? It hit that price early June. You waited that long?

[/ QUOTE ]

My cost is around $11.50 I think (maybe slightly more because, contrary to what Krishan said, I did buy more after we saw them). I bought my first shares around $10.50 and was buying pretty much every day for weeks. The stock was very thinly traded, but has since started to pick up.

Its a pretty simple thesis
1) Balance sheet is being refi'd at attractive rates (down from 11.5%) as I write this.
2) This is a classic example of a "rollup" that was not well run and is now being fixed. Its a good, steady product set (stuff that is consumed in the laying of concrete, primarily). They have only 7-8% residential exposure. Rest is 1/3 each commercial (office buildings), govt infrastructure (hwy and bridges), and institutional (steady biz...hospitals, universities, etc).
3) They have NOLs and should crap cash. We think they have a shot at $2/shr in FCF in 2008.

Sorry couldn't post earlier...couldn't do that until we were totally finished buying.

New CFO and CEO seem very focused and talented. I really don't think there is much downside here. The stock is maybe 5.5x our thoughts on EBITDA for 2008. This is too cheap. Every turn (i.e. multiple point) of ebitda is $5 per share.

Apollo, a buyout shop, owns half of this. For perpective, they did this deal in 2000 and their cost is around $13.50 a share...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.