omahahaha

[Janis N.]

Isn't his range like really wide here still? We're basically HU and he's super aggro.

I'd call and wouldn't mind getting it in on low non-hearts. On others I'd eval.

Oh and preflop is fine, we have position.

[ahnuld]

position is pretty big in omaha, preflop is standard. Id call flop, turn is turn dependant.

[DLizzle]

[ QUOTE ]
Isn't his range like really wide here still? We're basically HU and he's super aggro.

I'd call and wouldn't mind getting it in on low non-hearts. On others I'd eval.

Oh and preflop is fine, we have position.

[/ QUOTE ]

getting it in would probably be really bad. i'd just call, if you raise it's basically a bluff that won't work, but he probably folds almost everything worse. this is a tough spot though because if the turn is a blank and he fires again which he would a lot it will be a tough decision. Also if the board pairs he could easily have an overfull but you'll prob have to at least call another barrel. i would fold a lot of turns i think.

[Janis N.]

I agree that getting it in would be bad on the flop (as you're flipping like always and behind sometimes), but I think it would be OK on a blank turn imo unless he rarely two barrels.

I mean yes it's Omaha (and I'm bad at it) but that doesn't mean that everybody always has the nuts if it's a BvB vs. aggressive opponent.

[MATT111]

[ QUOTE ]
I agree that getting it in would be bad on the flop (as you're flipping like always and behind sometimes), but I think it would be OK on a blank turn imo unless he rarely two barrels.

I mean yes it's Omaha (and I'm bad at it) but that doesn't mean that everybody always has the nuts if it's a BvB vs. aggressive opponent.

[/ QUOTE ]


Then again our equity seems terrible against his calling range. We don`t expect him to lay down oversets, do we?

[Janis N.]

[ QUOTE ]
Then again our equity seems terrible against his calling range. We don`t expect him to lay down oversets, do we?

[/ QUOTE ]No, he never folds oversets but I don't see why they would be a large part of his range. "folded around to very very aggressive SB"... he's opening and cbetting 2 streets with a bunch here that isn't KKxx, QQxx, AJxx, J9xx.

Actually turn is tricky as pot is only $180 on the turn and I no longer like getting it all in there that much. Whether we raise or not depends on turn card and his bet.

But I still don't see why the majority opinion seems to be that we have a bluff catcher on a blank turn here.

[RoundTower]

I call now, if he is as aggro as you say I am probably calling most turns as well. And yes you can have a hand that you will call down with here.

[DLizzle]

[ QUOTE ]
I agree that getting it in would be bad on the flop (as you're flipping like always and behind sometimes)

[/ QUOTE ]

if we got it in on the flop i would guess that we are behind like always and flipping sometimes.