|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Some Simplistic Assumptions That Would Justify My Play
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] First assume that after scoring to go down by four you stop them. (This assumption helps my position because if you go for one and they come back to score a field goal, a rare last second comeback touchdown by you is a win rather than a tie [if you missed the two pointer]. But since this scenario is so rare, I will ignore it.) [/ QUOTE ] Also, I don't see how this assumption helps your case. It seems like it hurts it. If you don't stop them and they kick a FG, then obviously you would hope that you had kicked the XP to be down by only 6. [/ QUOTE ] My misprint. Changed it. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Some Simplistic Assumptions That Would Justify My Play
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Some Simplistic Assumptions That Would Justify My Play
MT2R,
Two point conversions aren't rare a spot as they are very similar to most redzone plays. The dynamic system can improve chances as well. |
|
|