anyone who is reasonable at poker, please read and comment

[HonestRyan]

i just want to second what 1PB and Btmset said. Your hand sample is so small its nearly meaningless. but imo, 100K hand sample is nothing as well. a lot of us put in 100K+ hands a month, so a 50K hand graph can just be running good for 2 weeks. I have 100K graphs that vary sometimes wildly/extremely from each other while my vpip and pfr remain within a tenth of a percent from each other. so yeah, tighten up a lil UTG, loosen up a lil more on the button, and put in some more hands. and post again when u put in 100K hands at the same limit.

[1p0kerboy]

So you ran bad on AIE and flopping sets.

Also let me add that the games are a tad bit tougher than they were at the beginning of the year. So if you're not winning 3+ptBB/100 then so be it.

[too eazy]

you guys are all absolutely wrong.

the problem comes from his play in UTG and UTG+1. have a clue.

and to the guy with that sample of a million nits, it tells me A)I should play FTP, and B) You probably have those results because the nits have to play more hands due to their [censored] winrates. And is that the standard PTBB? or the one that's just BB/100 cause I know you can change the option in PT and running at 6ptbb playing 20/5 over 800k hands seems blasphemous.

In my experience, I don't think 5+ ptbb can be achieved long term without at least 17vpip in full ring at 1/2+...

[Landlord79]

Not that my opinion matters much, but the 73% Fold to river bets seems like you're chasing draws a bit much, or have MUBs

[ActionStan]

too eazy,

You kill me. We need yo get you signed to a 10 post a day contract or something.

[ QUOTE ]

In my experience, I don't think 5+ ptbb can be achieved long term without at least 17vpip in full ring at 1/2+...


[/ QUOTE ]

Do you mean at least (18vpip==good) or at most (18vpip==bad)?

[ QUOTE ]

And is that the standard PTBB?


[/ QUOTE ]

A little arithmetic would show the latter, BB/100.

Anyway. His vpip is ~10 UTG & UTG+1. So he's playing pairs and AK roughly. Is it your suspicion that he's over committing to his big pairs? Raising too many small pairs that are difficult to play post flop? Some combination of both?

[too eazy]

[ QUOTE ]
too eazy,

You kill me. We need yo get you signed to a 10 post a day contract or something.

[/ QUOTE ]

Explain further, I don't understand. (English = Second Language).

[ QUOTE ]

Do you mean at least (18vpip==good) or at most (18vpip==bad)?


[/ QUOTE ]

I mean 17+ VPIP = Good.

And I don't care to elaborate on why I think OP's UTG and UTG+1 spots are his problem.

[ActionStan]

Your posts make me laugh. Bring us more of your wit.

[ QUOTE ]

I mean 17+ VPIP = Good.


[/ QUOTE ]

That's what I thought. Just making sure.

[bottomset]

this is my FR graph for the past 3months, its about 60% 1/2, 33% .5/1, and the rest is 2/4, with <1khands .25/.5, .1/.25




position stats


timed my switch to 1/2 perfectly [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[Eternal]

Here's my graph, I don't really want to show my stats. I'm a bit lazy when it comes to cropping.



Renton, look at your blue line and and compare it to this graph. This is me at NL200 for a brief period moving down from NL400. Now this is running bad... [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[Mike Kelley]

[ QUOTE ]
too eazy,

You kill me. We need yo get you signed to a 10 post a day contract or something.

[ QUOTE ]

In my experience, I don't think 5+ ptbb can be achieved long term without at least 17vpip in full ring at 1/2+...


[/ QUOTE ]

Do you mean at least (18vpip==good) or at most (18vpip==bad)?

[ QUOTE ]

And is that the standard PTBB?


[/ QUOTE ]

A little arithmetic would show the latter, BB/100.

Anyway. His vpip is ~10 UTG & UTG+1. So he's playing pairs and AK roughly. Is it your suspicion that he's over committing to his big pairs? Raising too many small pairs that are difficult to play post flop? Some combination of both?

[/ QUOTE ]

pairs plus AK = (13*.45) + 1.2 = 7.05
+AQ = 8.25
+KQ = 9.45
+AJs = 9.85

Easy on too eazy. he knows what he is talking about.