|
View Poll Results: Idiotic or Genius? | |||
Idiotic | 14 | 93.33% | |
Genius | 1 | 6.67% | |
Voters: 15. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: San Francisco goes after trans fats too
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] If I engaged in "widespread poisoning of the food supply" (whatever that's supposed to mean), then presumably you would not be able to eat food without poison in it. [/ QUOTE ] you'd be hard pressed to not eat trans fat unless you cook from scratch. and not eat out. what about fluoride in water. same thing really. [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Is the implication here that you're entitled to tell me I must learn to prefer certain types of foods, or else I am responsible for the lowered demand (and the metaphorical "poisoning") of the types of foods you wish were more readily for you? What if I'm a hunter who lives off my own game? What if I have throat cancer and am fed through a tube to my stomach? Is it my obligation to you to contribute to the demand for the types of foods that you want available? [/ QUOTE ] |
|
|