|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 10/20 River Decision with Broadway
[ QUOTE ]
So Joe, reading your last three posts: You believe the correct play is to 3-bet the river and fold to a 4 bet, yes? [/ QUOTE ] Yes. I'm fairly sure every live 4-bet I've paid off on the river HU has been a loser. Like 99%, maybe once, someone misread their hand. (not counting chop hands obv) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 10/20 River Decision with Broadway
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] So Joe, reading your last three posts: You believe the correct play is to 3-bet the river and fold to a 4 bet, yes? [/ QUOTE ] Yes. I'm fairly sure every live 4-bet I've paid off on the river HU has been a loser. Like 99%, maybe once, someone misread their hand. (not counting chop hands obv) [/ QUOTE ] The only times I have been paid off in 10/20 live when my opponent 4-bet was when I had the nuts (straights) and they didn't. In one case it was a woman who overplayed her 2nd nut straight thinking my 3-bet was a set. In the other case it was a guy who was blind in one eye and his vision wasn't much better in the other. He thought he had the nuts but misread his hand. While I think it is extremely likely that a 4-bet has us beat here (either AQs or ATs clubs), and is virtually never a bluff, I would call it anyway. Villain could have a set of Aces (or possibly Kings) and think we have a set too. He might have missed or dismissed the backdoor flush based on the way we played the hand so far. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
results?
JJH3984,
what happened here? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: results?
I threebet intending to fold to a fourball. He called and showed AK so MHIG. I felt good about it at the time, but now I think he may have won Sklanskey $$$$ off me.
He really should have AcQc a lot the way the hand played out. |
|
|