Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Two Plus Two > About the Forums
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-01-2007, 07:49 PM
nath nath is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Tone
Posts: 22,162
Default free Nate

so Nate just got permabanned on 2+2, and given his posting history (and that he's sitting next to me on the couch) I assume it's for this thread where he questions 2+2's book editing:

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...;gonew=1#UNREAD

The reason given for his ban: "Had enough."

Seriously? That's it? "Had enough"?! I guess Mason doesn't really welcome open debate or expression of ideas regarding his product. Real open-minded of him. Wouldn't want to improve it or anything.

Maybe we can let him back in if he apologizes for expressing an opinion, a la Paul Phillips.

Seriously, this is a complete joke. Nate is a great poster in numerous forums and banning him because someone peed in Mason's coffee is nothing short of absurd.

I could continue to rant on this at length but I think you get the idea. Free Nate!
  #2  
Old 07-01-2007, 07:53 PM
Popinjay Popinjay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: robusting
Posts: 3,144
Default Re: free Nate

This is the BP Nate right? If so, he's one of the best posters around and to have banned him for that thread is tyranny.
  #3  
Old 07-01-2007, 07:58 PM
Superfluous Man Superfluous Man is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Same rake, better progress
Posts: 3,130
Default Re: free Nate

nope it's the BAMF Nate.

FREE NATE!
  #4  
Old 07-01-2007, 08:00 PM
nath nath is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Tone
Posts: 22,162
Default Re: free Nate

[ QUOTE ]
This is the BP Nate right?

[/ QUOTE ]
If by "BP" you mean "Baseball Prospectus", then no, that's Nate tha Great. If you mean, uh, just about anything else, then yeah, probably.

Either way, this

[ QUOTE ]
he's one of the best posters around and to have banned him for that thread is tyranny.

[/ QUOTE ]

is definitely true.
  #5  
Old 07-01-2007, 08:05 PM
gobbomom gobbomom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: gobboville
Posts: 1,753
Default Re: free Nate

Nate was a good poster. I liked Nate's posts. Free Nate.
  #6  
Old 07-01-2007, 08:12 PM
steamboatin steamboatin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Here I am, brain the size of a planet and I can\'t beat the 2 cent O/8 game on UB. Depressing, isn\'t it?
Posts: 5,000
Default Re: free Nate

I think he went way to far in that thread, at what point do you think it is a good idea to tell the Grand Poohbah, He doesn't understand English?

He challenged Mason to a heads up editing match, LOL.
  #7  
Old 07-01-2007, 08:22 PM
Suigin406 Suigin406 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: fire isiah and minaya
Posts: 8,613
Default Re: free Nate

lol at the hu editing match
  #8  
Old 07-01-2007, 08:29 PM
XXXNoahXXX XXXNoahXXX is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Boston
Posts: 8,159
Default Re: free Nate

In that thread:

1) Nate had a really good point
2)He went way too far.


If anything, maybe the thread could have been locked or something, but Nate contributes way too much to ban him for this.

Free Nate!
  #9  
Old 07-01-2007, 08:33 PM
Five-Star Five-Star is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Molon Labe
Posts: 2,499
Default Re: free Nate

After reading the thread, I don't see how it could result in a permaban. It appears someone took his ball and told him to go home.
  #10  
Old 07-01-2007, 09:26 PM
reno expat reno expat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: The power of Bob Saget
Posts: 341
Default Re: free Nate

Definitely free Nate. He is an excellent poster with a long history both in the forums and the magazine. In the offending thread, he did his best to remain respectful at all times while asking what he (and I) believe to be an important question. The question boiled down to "would it be more profitable for 2+2 to do more rigorous copy editing?" He and Mason clearly disagree and Nate was as respectful as possible, while asking this question. (I'm not sure where I stand on that, but selfishly, it would make the books more readable and improve my game and bottom line). He did not attacks or throw around personal insults. I find his resulting ban to be the ultimate example of a person taking their ball and going home (coincidentally, what Ray Zee accused Nate of in the thread).
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.