Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Brick and Mortar
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-26-2007, 03:56 AM
iceman5 iceman5 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,207
Default MGM ruling

Someone tell me if this is the correct ruling.

I limp in MP and the ther are 2 other limps. A guy raises to $25 in the SB (2/5 game). I call, theres another call and then I look over and the raiser is showing his friend (who is on his right and in the hand) his cards.

Im not sure if his friend saw the cards or not because he threw his $25 in the pot just as I called out to the dealer that the guy was exposing his cards to a player.

The dealer calls the floor. As soon as he yesll "FLOOR!!", the moron shows the whole table his cards and he has QQ.
Rhe fllor arrives and the dealers tells him "he is accusing that guy of exposing his cards to another player still in the hand".

The floor asks the dealer if he saw it and he says No.

I ask the floor if his hand is dead and he says no. Since everyone knows what his cards are, we should play out the hand. I didnt argue since Im pretty sure I can outplay the idiot when I know what his cards are.

Was the floor correct or is his hand dead and the rest of us play out the hand?

Just for comedic value, Ill say that the idiot open pushed $500 into the $100 pot on a Jxx flop even though we all knew what he had. Obviously someone calls if they have him beat and folds other wise.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-26-2007, 04:16 AM
Gonso Gonso is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: seat zero
Posts: 3,265
Default Re: MGM ruling

Depends on the house -

I have seen a couple of occasions where the the hand was played, but the other player was not obligated to call any further raises (treated as all-ins).

In a multi-way pot this is a mess though.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-26-2007, 04:24 AM
daryn daryn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Boston
Posts: 18,335
Default Re: MGM ruling

exposed hand shouldn't be dead in a cash game, or in a tournament for that matter
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-26-2007, 08:22 AM
Javanewt Javanewt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Lexington, Kentucky
Posts: 1,060
Default Re: MGM ruling

daryn, what if the player showed it only to one player who was still in the hand? Should the other players just ask to see it, too, and expect to be able to?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-26-2007, 09:19 AM
Gordon Scott Gordon Scott is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Alabama
Posts: 632
Default Re: MGM ruling

[ QUOTE ]
exposed hand shouldn't be dead in a cash game, or in a tournament for that matter

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't disagree with the fact that your hand "SHOULDN'T" be dead, but in most tournaments I've played in the last few years if you show your hand it is as dead as fried chicken.

GA
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-26-2007, 10:17 AM
Don Olney Don Olney is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Table 7 Seat 3
Posts: 621
Default Re: MGM ruling

IF a card or cards are exposed to a player, in the hand or not, during the play of the hand the card or cards should be exposed to the table.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-26-2007, 10:23 AM
LuckyTxGuy LuckyTxGuy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Deep East Texas
Posts: 1,198
Default Re: MGM ruling

Just a quick question that I was unsure of after reading the story. Was the player exposing his cards to a player still in the hand or just a buddy beside him who had already folded?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-26-2007, 10:23 AM
chillrob chillrob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 561
Default Re: MGM ruling

The guy is obviously an idiot, but it sounds like the situation was handled the best way possible. If he hadn't turned up his cards voluntarily I think they would have to make him turn them up for all players in the hand to see.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-26-2007, 10:42 AM
AngusThermopyle AngusThermopyle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Riding Binky toward Ankh-Morpork
Posts: 4,366
Default Re: MGM ruling

1. "Buddy" sees QQ and calls $20 more anyway?
2. Dealer doesn't see it?
3. Floor doesn't ask the Button (Buddy) or SB(raiser) what happened?
4. Floor doesn't warn Button and SB not to share information when in a hand?
5. OP wants to kill the hand?

Correct ruling, I guess.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-26-2007, 11:10 AM
PantsOnFire PantsOnFire is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,409
Default Re: MGM ruling

Here are the most common rules that I am aware of.

1. Showing your hand to a live player will result in immediately showing your hand to the table, tourney or cash. In a tourney, you may face a time out penalty after the hand. In a cash game, it is -EV for you to do this so there is no penalty but if you continually do it, you may be asked to leave.

2. Showing your hand to a non-live player will result in showing the rest of the table after the hand is over (however, only if another player complains). In a tourney, you may face a time out penalty after the hand. In a small stakes cash game, this can usually be let go, especially between friends. And it depends on the situation. For example, UTG raises, friend 1 folds, friend 2 shows friend 1 his hand and folds. This is really minor. However, if a hand is played for a street or two and somebody folds showing a stranger beside him his great laydown, I would ask to see that hand.

[ QUOTE ]
Just for comedic value, Ill say that the idiot open pushed $500 into the $100 pot on a Jxx flop even though we all knew what he had. Obviously someone calls if they have him beat and folds other wise.

[/ QUOTE ]
Why is this a bad play? What's a better play? Checking it down and hoping you don't get outdrawn? Betting something like $50 would have been interesting since calculating implied odds has a new twist. Personally, I would have made the same push and if somebody had a set or some asnine Jx hand, then good for them. Otherwise, the only thing any opponent could have is a draw and the push takes away all odds for drawing.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.