Really weird lower stakes live hand. Still confused about it.

[ImWeakTight@UCLA]

This is a5s a5 45s 45 56s 56 maybe 57s. He is trying to get payed off he has no clue how good you are. He thinks 70% of the boats will call an all in.

[TxRedMan]

first you ask him if he's ever heard of the zeebo theorem....

[jsnipes28]

[ QUOTE ]
This is a5s a5 45s 45 56s 56 maybe 57s. He is trying to get payed off he has no clue how good you are. He thinks 70% of the boats will call an all in.

[/ QUOTE ]

wow...never thought of that angle

[pnazari]

like you said, he cant have AA or KK and he probably plays TT-QQ alot slower (since he chose to flat call with so many runners). couple this with the fact that live nits are so predictable and you see quads ~100% of the time. good fold.

[JCarver]

[ QUOTE ]
first you ask him if he's ever heard of the zeebo theorem....

[/ QUOTE ]
i think this is actually a really good idea

-EC10

[1o BoY]

[ QUOTE ]
This is a5s a5 45s 45 56s 56 maybe 57s. He is trying to get payed off he has no clue how good you are. He thinks 70% of the boats will call an all in.

[/ QUOTE ]

nice read

[breitling996]

jj-99

[tomahawk]

I'm thinking kings for sure here.. dunno why really

[Kala1928]

If he is scared money why would he shove all his chips with what is essentially a pair of nines/tens/jacks ?

[Kaka]

Good Fold. I see 5x as a real possibility given six way action preflop. I agree this is not a bluff given your description. 'Twould be a bold move for his first pot. What was your pair?

Another question: I see about 1100 in the pot pre-shove, given your description: 1600 to call with the pot at 2700, or about 10:6 (1.7:1). Odds aren't great even with a bigger pot than "700 at most," which would put odds at 10:7 (1.4:1). I agree this is not a bluff