November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread

[oldbookguy]

The point is, there exists regulations and taxes already, any bill would just extend thos to poker, though the DoJ feels they already do apply. You were posting as if there are no taxes or regulations and they would be something new.

Even the current legal wagering has regulations, it will extend those to poker, that is all.

If it is detrimental, doubtful.

Again, based on what has been said before congress on the matter, (this year and prior to UIGEA) regulation and licensing are desired.

That, as I posted, is my point in my reply.

Sorry, I meant you no offense.

obg