|
|
|
|
#1
11-28-2007, 07:56 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ipoker bonuses vs. the rest
i know a guy like you who tries to give non real world examples to prove yr point.
full tilt and cake have dealt, ongame has contribution. please use their rates to convince me or others that they would be better off at ongame re bonus and rkbck. 
|
|
#2
11-28-2007, 08:02 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ipoker bonuses vs. the rest
[ QUOTE ]
i know a guy like you who tries to give non real world examples to prove yr point. full tilt and cake have dealt, ongame has contribution. please use their rates to convince me or others that they would be better off at ongame re bonus and rkbck. [/ QUOTE ] Sigh. I don't know much about your game/stakes (IE not just what they are, but how they play - pot sizes, etc), nor how you play, so I wouldn't be qualified to do so. I already posted my own numbers for Cake vs OnGame...OnGame clears almost twice as fast for me. FT is worse. For me, OnGame is best. Maybe it isn't for you. All I have been trying to get from you all this time is a concession that even if OnGame isn't the best bonus for you, it might be for other people.
|
|
#3
11-28-2007, 11:38 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ipoker bonuses vs. the rest
hey mr this.
if you really want to clear [censored] fast learn plo high and low 8 or better. i just checked bw clear rates. hmmm nl .25 .50 ongme 5x bonus clears at 1.34 hr full ring. cake clears at 1.27 hour. so to clear 100$ at each should take similiar amount of hours. yet it takes me 4 times as long at ongame than at cake. somethin just doesnt add up. cleareance rates at bw just like 2+2 =7. bw good for informing players of reloads.red star got one now.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
