|
|
#341
10-03-2007, 04:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Fate of #756 by Marc Ecko
[ QUOTE ]
What he has "gaps" in is his standards, not his critical thinking. And we might be better off saying it is YOU who has a gap in his standards. [/ QUOTE ] The quote is not mine, but attributed to the Pulitzer panel. It would be their standards applied in determining that the book cannot be viewed as factual, not mine. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] An objective source had access to all the author's notes and other details used in writing the book, they did extensive research to determine the investigative and journalistic merits of the piece in consideration for award.... ....and they came out of it with the opinion that the book could not be viewed as factual. Oops... 
|
|
#342
10-09-2007, 09:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Fate of #756 by Marc Ecko
NSFW link to Kimberly Bell pictures from Playboy
Obv on HGH, I mean, look at the size of her, um, head...
|
|
#343
10-10-2007, 12:30 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Fate of #756 by Marc Ecko
[ QUOTE ]
NSFW link to Kimberly Bell pictures from Playboy Obv on HGH, I mean, look at the size of her, um, head... [/ QUOTE ] quality bump
|
|
#344
11-01-2007, 11:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Fate of #756 by Marc Ecko
Bonds will boycott the HOF if they display the ball with an asterisk.
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3090631
|
|
#345
11-02-2007, 12:01 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Fate of #756 by Marc Ecko
[ QUOTE ]
Bonds will boycott the HOF if they display the ball with an asterisk. http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3090631 [/ QUOTE ] I think he's bluffing
|
|
#347
11-02-2007, 12:29 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Fate of #756 by Marc Ecko
[ QUOTE ]
Bonds will boycott the HOF if they display the ball with an asterisk. http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3090631 [/ QUOTE ] SWEET sounds like a win-win
|
|
#348
11-02-2007, 12:31 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Fate of #756 by Marc Ecko
If he follows through with this then he just jumped a little higher in my book.
|
|
#349
11-02-2007, 01:30 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Fate of #756 by Marc Ecko
[ QUOTE ]
They could still put him in the Hall against his will right? I mean he wont show up for the induction ceremony but otherwise why would the Hall care? [/ QUOTE ] Them putting in the ball and not inducting him would be slightly hypocritical. Of course not quite since HOF committee determines the ball and BBWA decides HOF.
|
|
#350
11-02-2007, 01:48 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Fate of #756 by Marc Ecko
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] They could still put him in the Hall against his will right? I mean he wont show up for the induction ceremony but otherwise why would the Hall care? [/ QUOTE ] Them putting in the ball and not inducting him would be slightly hypocritical. Of course not quite since HOF committee determines the ball and BBWA decides HOF. [/ QUOTE ] My point is, cant they still induct him? He doesnt have to be willing for them to do that, does he? They might have to modify their ceremony a bit, and its going to be a temporary black eye for them I'm sure, but they can still put him in. Or, at least thats what I'm asking.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
