#41
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Obvious Collusion - Pokerstars
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I wouldnt call it obvious. However those that are discounting it completely are also foolish. This was a satellite, not a standard tournament. The big stack gains nothing from doing this.Nothing. From the hand history, the big stack calls the all in after liverspot goes all in. One hand proves nothing and in this case it is a decent play to try end the tournament. If this were to continously happen, then it becomes suspicsous. [/ QUOTE ] I'd do this as big stack simply to make my opponents pay dearly for being the donkeys that they are and not following proper satellite strategy. [/ QUOTE ] but then you're preventing the donkament you're satelliting into from having the worst possible players [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Obvious Collusion - Pokerstars
[ QUOTE ]
but then you're preventing the donkament you're satelliting into from having the worst possible players [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] i.e., players like Liverspot |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Obvious Collusion - Pokerstars
Raymer - nice post. pretty much what I was thinking.
Except there was another aspect that others seem to be hitting on which is: [ QUOTE ] If I push every hand I am greatly increasing his odds of making it in. I either A) get someone else to call and have the chance of busting them so you get in [/ QUOTE ] This one makes little sense to me. How does this greatly increase the short-stack's chances of making it in? The first criteria is that you would have to have another player stupid enough to actually call. Now, it is possible that somebody might not be able to resist when they have AA or KK even though they should probably be folding those too by this point. But I don't think that qualifies as greatly increasing the super-short stack's chances. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Obvious Collusion - Pokerstars
Because if the big stack isnt pushing there is almost no way the super short stack makes it in because he is goign to be blinded off with huge luck?
|
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Obvious Collusion - Pokerstars
Guys,
Since even Greg Raymer has gone and commented on this ridicoulous accusation (based on anger at bubbling I assume) ; I've attached the hand that happened just before the hand that was posted by Imnotsogood. You can draw your own conclusions. PokerStars Game #12141083342: Tournament #61150023, $100+$9 Hold'em No Limit - Level XIII (1000/2000) - 2007/09/19 - 00:48:40 (ET) Table '61150023 3' 9-max Seat #5 is the button Seat 1: ImNotSoGood (15854 in chips) Seat 4: CACIATORE (39887 in chips) Seat 5: RickyReardon (81182 in chips) Seat 6: LiverSpot (18966 in chips) Seat 7: vikihris (15566 in chips) Seat 8: the_rotter77 (79325 in chips) Seat 9: hubla1 (14720 in chips) ImNotSoGood: posts the ante 200 CACIATORE: posts the ante 200 RickyReardon: posts the ante 200 LiverSpot: posts the ante 200 vikihris: posts the ante 200 the_rotter77: posts the ante 200 hubla1: posts the ante 200 LiverSpot: posts small blind 1000 vikihris: posts big blind 2000 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to the_rotter77 [Ad 9c] the_rotter77: raises 4000 to 6000 hubla1: folds ImNotSoGood: folds CACIATORE: folds RickyReardon: calls 6000 LiverSpot: calls 5000 vikihris: folds *** FLOP *** [As 5h 5d] LiverSpot: checks the_rotter77: checks RickyReardon: checks *** TURN *** [As 5h 5d] [5s] LiverSpot: checks the_rotter77: bets 6000 RickyReardon: folds LiverSpot: calls 6000 *** RIVER *** [As 5h 5d 5s] [Qc] LiverSpot: checks the_rotter77: bets 6000 LiverSpot: calls 6000 *** SHOW DOWN *** the_rotter77: shows [Ad 9c] (a full house, Fives full of Aces) LiverSpot: mucks hand the_rotter77 collected 45400 from pot *** SUMMARY *** Total pot 45400 | Rake 0 Board [As 5h 5d 5s Qc] Seat 1: ImNotSoGood folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 4: CACIATORE folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 5: RickyReardon (button) folded on the Turn Seat 6: LiverSpot (small blind) mucked [Ks Kc] Seat 7: vikihris (big blind) folded before Flop Seat 8: the_rotter77 showed [Ad 9c] and won (45400) with a full house, Fives full of Aces Seat 9: hubla1 folded before Flop (didn't bet) PokerStars Game #12141101058: Tournament #61150023, $100+$9 Hold'em No Limit - Level XIII (1000/2000) - 2007/09/19 - 00:50:02 (ET) Table '61150023 3' 9-max Seat #6 is the button Seat 1: ImNotSoGood (15654 in chips) Seat 4: CACIATORE (39687 in chips) Seat 5: RickyReardon (74982 in chips) Seat 6: LiverSpot (766 in chips) Seat 7: vikihris (13366 in chips) Seat 8: the_rotter77 (106525 in chips) Seat 9: hubla1 (14520 in chips) ImNotSoGood: posts the ante 200 CACIATORE: posts the ante 200 RickyReardon: posts the ante 200 LiverSpot: posts the ante 200 vikihris: posts the ante 200 the_rotter77: posts the ante 200 hubla1: posts the ante 200 vikihris: posts small blind 1000 the_rotter77: posts big blind 2000 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to the_rotter77 [Ac 3d] hubla1: folds ImNotSoGood: folds CACIATORE: calls 2000 RickyReardon: calls 2000 LiverSpot: calls 566 and is all-in vikihris: calls 1000 the_rotter77: raises 104325 to 106325 and is all-in CACIATORE: folds RickyReardon: folds vikihris: folds *** FLOP *** [2c 2d Ts] *** TURN *** [2c 2d Ts] [Jh] *** RIVER *** [2c 2d Ts Jh] [Th] *** SHOW DOWN *** the_rotter77: shows [Ac 3d] (two pair, Tens and Deuces) the_rotter77 collected 5736 from side pot LiverSpot: shows [3h As] (two pair, Tens and Deuces) the_rotter77 collected 2115 from main pot LiverSpot collected 2115 from main pot *** SUMMARY *** Total pot 9966 Main pot 4230. Side pot 5736. | Rake 0 Board [2c 2d Ts Jh Th] Seat 1: ImNotSoGood folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 4: CACIATORE folded before Flop Seat 5: RickyReardon folded before Flop Seat 6: LiverSpot (button) showed [3h As] and won (2115) with two pair, Tens and Deuces Seat 7: vikihris (small blind) folded before Flop Seat 8: the_rotter77 (big blind) showed [Ac 3d] and won (7851) with two pair, Tens and Deuces Seat 9: hubla1 folded before Flop (didn't bet) |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Obvious Collusion - Pokerstars
[ QUOTE ]
*** RIVER *** [As 5h 5d 5s] [Qc] LiverSpot: checks the_rotter77: bets 6000 LiverSpot: calls 6000 [/ QUOTE ] If the_rotter77 had simply typed "6766" instead of "6000", this thread might never had occurred! |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Obvious Collusion - Pokerstars
You guys need to relax with the flaming, I already admitted that this is def not collusion. It was a big stack just being evil and prob having a blast. It was a steam post from bubbling (it was 109r to the 2600 ME for those saying it was a 10 sit and go or w/e) and being on a 10k downswing.
I did happen to get a 2 day ban for telling sum1 to die. Its just so much worse bubbling after playing for hours and being like a 99.9 fav to get a seat. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Obvious Collusion - Pokerstars
Collusion or not, pushing allin on this hand here is poor play . There are two limpers which mean they have decent hands. The shortstack is allin. The proper play is to call or fold assuming this is the bubble. He's not going to beat 4 hands most of the time and isolating him with A3o here is assuming he has a better hand than you and that you're looking to pick up the pot based on the overlay since he's shortstacked. I would flame you for making this shove on the bubble because it's just not smart.
|
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Obvious Collusion - Pokerstars
[ QUOTE ]
Collusion or not, pushing allin on this hand here is poor play . There are two limpers which mean they have decent hands. The shortstack is allin. The proper play is to call or fold assuming this is the bubble. He's not going to beat 4 hands most of the time and isolating him with A3o here is assuming he has a better hand than you and that you're looking to pick up the pot based on the overlay since he's shortstacked. I would flame you for making this shove on the bubble because it's just not smart. [/ QUOTE ] Thanks for enlightening us pro. The point is that the big stack doesn't care if it's a "good" play b/c he is getting a seat regardless of what happens. He is just messing around b/c it's fun to terrorize people on a satellite bubble when you get the chance. |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Obvious Collusion - Pokerstars
dude
I've played a million of the wcoop sats, and this is incredibly standard. People are retarded. They're retarded in the 11rs and they're retarded in the 80r/109r. No one knows how to play satellites, and big stacks shove on the bubble all the time. 75% of the bubble strategy in these things is figuring out which kind of dumb the dumb people are. edit - not intended to flame; bad luck op, nothing more frustrating than bubbling this way. The worst is when three or four people make bad calls and every time the allin wins, then they make a bad call on you with the worst hand and win. |
|
|