Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > News, Views, and Gossip
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 09-21-2007, 04:46 PM
adanthar adanthar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Intrepidly Reporting
Posts: 14,174
Default Re: Obvious Collusion - Pokerstars

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I wouldnt call it obvious. However those that are discounting it completely are also foolish. This was a satellite, not a standard tournament. The big stack gains nothing from doing this.Nothing. From the hand history, the big stack calls the all in after liverspot goes all in. One hand proves nothing and in this case it is a decent play to try end the tournament. If this were to continously happen, then it becomes suspicsous.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'd do this as big stack simply to make my opponents pay dearly for being the donkeys that they are and not following proper satellite strategy.

[/ QUOTE ]

but then you're preventing the donkament you're satelliting into from having the worst possible players [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 09-21-2007, 08:19 PM
jsbjoe jsbjoe is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 85
Default Re: Obvious Collusion - Pokerstars

[ QUOTE ]
but then you're preventing the donkament you're satelliting into from having the worst possible players [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

i.e., players like Liverspot
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 09-21-2007, 08:44 PM
MicroBob MicroBob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The cat is back by popular demand.
Posts: 29,344
Default Re: Obvious Collusion - Pokerstars

Raymer - nice post. pretty much what I was thinking.

Except there was another aspect that others seem to be hitting on which is:

[ QUOTE ]
If I push every hand I am greatly increasing his odds of making it in. I either A) get someone else to call and have the chance of busting them so you get in

[/ QUOTE ]


This one makes little sense to me. How does this greatly increase the short-stack's chances of making it in?
The first criteria is that you would have to have another player stupid enough to actually call. Now, it is possible that somebody might not be able to resist when they have AA or KK even though they should probably be folding those too by this point. But I don't think that qualifies as greatly increasing the super-short stack's chances.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 09-21-2007, 09:04 PM
ZOMG_RIGGED! ZOMG_RIGGED! is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Does this smell like Chloroform to you?
Posts: 1,268
Default Re: Obvious Collusion - Pokerstars

Because if the big stack isnt pushing there is almost no way the super short stack makes it in because he is goign to be blinded off with huge luck?
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 09-21-2007, 11:44 PM
pokey79 pokey79 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 10
Default Re: Obvious Collusion - Pokerstars

Guys,

Since even Greg Raymer has gone and commented on this ridicoulous accusation (based on anger at bubbling I assume) ; I've attached the hand that happened just before the hand that was posted by Imnotsogood.
You can draw your own conclusions.

PokerStars Game #12141083342: Tournament #61150023, $100+$9 Hold'em No Limit - Level XIII (1000/2000) - 2007/09/19 - 00:48:40 (ET)
Table '61150023 3' 9-max Seat #5 is the button
Seat 1: ImNotSoGood (15854 in chips)
Seat 4: CACIATORE (39887 in chips)
Seat 5: RickyReardon (81182 in chips)
Seat 6: LiverSpot (18966 in chips)
Seat 7: vikihris (15566 in chips)
Seat 8: the_rotter77 (79325 in chips)
Seat 9: hubla1 (14720 in chips)
ImNotSoGood: posts the ante 200
CACIATORE: posts the ante 200
RickyReardon: posts the ante 200
LiverSpot: posts the ante 200
vikihris: posts the ante 200
the_rotter77: posts the ante 200
hubla1: posts the ante 200
LiverSpot: posts small blind 1000
vikihris: posts big blind 2000
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to the_rotter77 [Ad 9c]
the_rotter77: raises 4000 to 6000
hubla1: folds
ImNotSoGood: folds
CACIATORE: folds
RickyReardon: calls 6000
LiverSpot: calls 5000
vikihris: folds
*** FLOP *** [As 5h 5d]
LiverSpot: checks
the_rotter77: checks
RickyReardon: checks
*** TURN *** [As 5h 5d] [5s]
LiverSpot: checks
the_rotter77: bets 6000
RickyReardon: folds
LiverSpot: calls 6000
*** RIVER *** [As 5h 5d 5s] [Qc]
LiverSpot: checks
the_rotter77: bets 6000
LiverSpot: calls 6000
*** SHOW DOWN ***
the_rotter77: shows [Ad 9c] (a full house, Fives full of Aces)
LiverSpot: mucks hand
the_rotter77 collected 45400 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 45400 | Rake 0
Board [As 5h 5d 5s Qc]
Seat 1: ImNotSoGood folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 4: CACIATORE folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 5: RickyReardon (button) folded on the Turn
Seat 6: LiverSpot (small blind) mucked [Ks Kc]
Seat 7: vikihris (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 8: the_rotter77 showed [Ad 9c] and won (45400) with a full house, Fives full of Aces
Seat 9: hubla1 folded before Flop (didn't bet)



PokerStars Game #12141101058: Tournament #61150023, $100+$9 Hold'em No Limit - Level XIII (1000/2000) - 2007/09/19 - 00:50:02 (ET)
Table '61150023 3' 9-max Seat #6 is the button
Seat 1: ImNotSoGood (15654 in chips)
Seat 4: CACIATORE (39687 in chips)
Seat 5: RickyReardon (74982 in chips)
Seat 6: LiverSpot (766 in chips)
Seat 7: vikihris (13366 in chips)
Seat 8: the_rotter77 (106525 in chips)
Seat 9: hubla1 (14520 in chips)
ImNotSoGood: posts the ante 200
CACIATORE: posts the ante 200
RickyReardon: posts the ante 200
LiverSpot: posts the ante 200
vikihris: posts the ante 200
the_rotter77: posts the ante 200
hubla1: posts the ante 200
vikihris: posts small blind 1000
the_rotter77: posts big blind 2000
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to the_rotter77 [Ac 3d]
hubla1: folds
ImNotSoGood: folds
CACIATORE: calls 2000
RickyReardon: calls 2000
LiverSpot: calls 566 and is all-in
vikihris: calls 1000
the_rotter77: raises 104325 to 106325 and is all-in
CACIATORE: folds
RickyReardon: folds
vikihris: folds
*** FLOP *** [2c 2d Ts]
*** TURN *** [2c 2d Ts] [Jh]
*** RIVER *** [2c 2d Ts Jh] [Th]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
the_rotter77: shows [Ac 3d] (two pair, Tens and Deuces)
the_rotter77 collected 5736 from side pot
LiverSpot: shows [3h As] (two pair, Tens and Deuces)
the_rotter77 collected 2115 from main pot
LiverSpot collected 2115 from main pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 9966 Main pot 4230. Side pot 5736. | Rake 0
Board [2c 2d Ts Jh Th]
Seat 1: ImNotSoGood folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 4: CACIATORE folded before Flop
Seat 5: RickyReardon folded before Flop
Seat 6: LiverSpot (button) showed [3h As] and won (2115) with two pair, Tens and Deuces
Seat 7: vikihris (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 8: the_rotter77 (big blind) showed [Ac 3d] and won (7851) with two pair, Tens and Deuces
Seat 9: hubla1 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 09-22-2007, 12:45 AM
sopoRific sopoRific is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Professional Lurker
Posts: 31
Default Re: Obvious Collusion - Pokerstars

[ QUOTE ]

*** RIVER *** [As 5h 5d 5s] [Qc]
LiverSpot: checks
the_rotter77: bets 6000
LiverSpot: calls 6000

[/ QUOTE ]

If the_rotter77 had simply typed "6766" instead of "6000", this thread might never had occurred!
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 09-22-2007, 01:11 AM
ImNotSoGood ImNotSoGood is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 361
Default Re: Obvious Collusion - Pokerstars

You guys need to relax with the flaming, I already admitted that this is def not collusion. It was a big stack just being evil and prob having a blast. It was a steam post from bubbling (it was 109r to the 2600 ME for those saying it was a 10 sit and go or w/e) and being on a 10k downswing.

I did happen to get a 2 day ban for telling sum1 to die. Its just so much worse bubbling after playing for hours and being like a 99.9 fav to get a seat.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 09-22-2007, 01:25 AM
korrupt106 korrupt106 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 21
Default Re: Obvious Collusion - Pokerstars

Collusion or not, pushing allin on this hand here is poor play . There are two limpers which mean they have decent hands. The shortstack is allin. The proper play is to call or fold assuming this is the bubble. He's not going to beat 4 hands most of the time and isolating him with A3o here is assuming he has a better hand than you and that you're looking to pick up the pot based on the overlay since he's shortstacked. I would flame you for making this shove on the bubble because it's just not smart.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 09-22-2007, 01:34 AM
selurah selurah is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Indy
Posts: 1,054
Default Re: Obvious Collusion - Pokerstars

[ QUOTE ]
Collusion or not, pushing allin on this hand here is poor play . There are two limpers which mean they have decent hands. The shortstack is allin. The proper play is to call or fold assuming this is the bubble. He's not going to beat 4 hands most of the time and isolating him with A3o here is assuming he has a better hand than you and that you're looking to pick up the pot based on the overlay since he's shortstacked. I would flame you for making this shove on the bubble because it's just not smart.

[/ QUOTE ]

Thanks for enlightening us pro. The point is that the big stack doesn't care if it's a "good" play b/c he is getting a seat regardless of what happens. He is just messing around b/c it's fun to terrorize people on a satellite bubble when you get the chance.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 09-22-2007, 01:38 AM
LearnedfromTV LearnedfromTV is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Coaching
Posts: 5,914
Default Re: Obvious Collusion - Pokerstars

dude

I've played a million of the wcoop sats, and this is incredibly standard. People are retarded. They're retarded in the 11rs and they're retarded in the 80r/109r.

No one knows how to play satellites, and big stacks shove on the bubble all the time. 75% of the bubble strategy in these things is figuring out which kind of dumb the dumb people are.

edit - not intended to flame; bad luck op, nothing more frustrating than bubbling this way. The worst is when three or four people make bad calls and every time the allin wins, then they make a bad call on you with the worst hand and win.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.