|
|
#12
06-18-2007, 12:53 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Second pair river choice
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] chicken love chicago did you see that bean yet. awesome eh? [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] you lost me there. [/ QUOTE ] this (my own pic):  also google chicago bean to see many many more pics 
|
|
#13
06-18-2007, 01:21 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Second pair river choice
[ QUOTE ]
At this table I don't think I would raise PF. [/ QUOTE ] I didn't put in the OP why I raised preflop. The button was a TAG, so my raise was for value(ever so thin) and for that lovely positional advantage.
|
|
#15
06-18-2007, 02:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Second pair river choice
why dont anyone bet the river? we have to bet because they are calling stations right? even there is 3 people left, chances are we still have the best hand, and we get 3 more extra bet, thats a lot!
|
|
#16
06-18-2007, 06:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Second pair river choice
If we get called by all 3 we usually lose; they may be fish but that doesn't mean they don't have cards. The question isn't so much whether we're a favorite against each individual range (we are), it's a question of how often our bet runs into some badly played better hand. With hero's PFR, the K flopping and the flush draw coming in on the turn, loose-passives are going to incorrectly check down a number of hands that beat us. Also it's not impossible they manage to fold a very weak pair on this board as even fish can see flushes. Yeah I wouldn't be surprised to see someone call with QT or A6 but I wouldn't be shocked to see AQ either.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
