Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Science, Math, and Philosophy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-17-2007, 03:12 PM
ZeeJustin ZeeJustin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,381
Default Checkers Has Been Solved

Checkers Has Been Solved
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-17-2007, 03:19 PM
ChrisV ChrisV is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 5,104
Default Re: Checkers Has Been Solved

Wow. I didn't know they were close to doing that. Kind of sad in a way as well as interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-17-2007, 04:04 PM
ZeeJustin ZeeJustin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,381
Default Re: Checkers Has Been Solved

[ QUOTE ]
Wow. I didn't know they were close to doing that. Kind of sad in a way as well as interesting.

[/ QUOTE ]

Heh. It's funny that you responded this way. I was shocked that it hadn't been done already.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-17-2007, 04:33 PM
Sephus Sephus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,994
Default Re: Checkers Has Been Solved

repost
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-17-2007, 04:33 PM
soon2bepro soon2bepro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,275
Default Re: Checkers Has Been Solved

finally.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-17-2007, 06:41 PM
pzhon pzhon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,515
Default Re: Checkers Has Been Solved

This result was posted earlier in other forums. That article is wrong in several places.

The endgame database is of 10 or fewer pieces, not fewer than 10. These positions were solved, not played out.

There aren't 19 opening moves, obviously. There were 19 openings solved out of more than 100 3-move openings played in tournament checkers (where players have to play a game from each side of a 3 move opening). Tournament checkers is not solved.

The article was correct in that not all positions were searched. Several other newspaper articles falsely claimed that they were, and Wikipedia repeated this error. However, the reason given was that positions were equivalent, which is absurd. This reduces the size of an endgame database very slightly, but it doesn't drop the number of positions from about 10^21 to 10^14, as there aren't 10^7 symmetries. It's simply not necessary to search through all positions to establish the result.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.