|
|
#1
09-25-2007, 01:23 AM
|
|||
|
|||
I hate TP vs nits - 200 NL
MP is super fish station, running 40/20 or something, can't fold bottom pair, etc.
BB is a regular, but very nitty, running 16/11. I checked flop because his cold call preflop is obviously pretty strong and this is a dry flop. Party Poker - No Limit Hold'em Cash Game - $1/$2 Blinds - 6 Players - (LegoPoker Hand History Converter) SB: $821.44 BB: $192.40 UTG: $196.35 MP: $269.21 CO: $206.15 Hero (BTN): $257.90 Preflop: Hero is dealt K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (6 Players) UTG folds, <font color="red">MP raises to $4.00</font>, CO folds, <font color="red">Hero raises to $14.00</font>, SB folds, BB calls $12.00, MP calls $10.00 Flop: ($43) Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 4[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (3 Players) BB checks, MP checks, Hero checks Turn: ($43) 6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (3 Players) BB checks, MP checks, <font color="red">Hero bets $25.00</font>, <font color="red">BB raises to $75.00</font>, MP folds, Hero Pot Size: $143.00 
|
|
#2
09-25-2007, 01:26 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I hate TP vs nits - 200 NL
Turbomucks. And WTF with the preflop 3-bet?
|
|
#4
09-25-2007, 01:26 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I hate TP vs nits - 200 NL
I like how you played it so far, now fold.
A 16/11 cold-calling should already send warning bells. I would say his range for cold-calling pf is something like AK/JJ+. He's not making a move on you, he has AA/KK/QQ.
|
|
#5
09-25-2007, 01:28 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I hate TP vs nits - 200 NL
i guess i understand trying to isolate the fish in position, but KQ isnt the type of hand you stack fish with
why on earth didnt you bet the flop??? then the turn bet is too small as played, fold turn
|
|
#6
09-25-2007, 01:30 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I hate TP vs nits - 200 NL
[ QUOTE ]
Turbomucks. And WTF with the preflop 3-bet? [/ QUOTE ] Preflop is fine to try to isolate the fishy. As played you gotta instamuck it to the turn c/r, he's repping soooo much strength.
|
|
#8
09-25-2007, 01:33 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I hate TP vs nits - 200 NL
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Turbomucks. And WTF with the preflop 3-bet? [/ QUOTE ] Preflop is fine to try to isolate the fishy. As played you gotta instamuck it to the turn c/r, he's repping soooo much strength. [/ QUOTE ] Well, really, I think this is way overrated. You have the button, fish is only raising 20%, you have a great implied odds hand, who cares if the blinds decide to come along? Get in cheap, stack fish anyway.
|
|
#9
09-25-2007, 01:34 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I hate TP vs nits - 200 NL
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] why on earth didnt you bet the flop??? [/ QUOTE ] The nitty cold-caller could easily be setting a tarp. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah I'm fine with checking such a dry board.
|
|
#10
09-25-2007, 01:34 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I hate TP vs nits - 200 NL
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Turbomucks. And WTF with the preflop 3-bet? [/ QUOTE ] Preflop is fine to try to isolate the fishy. As played you gotta instamuck it to the turn c/r, he's repping soooo much strength. [/ QUOTE ] Well, really, I think this is way overrated. You have the button, fish is only raising 20%, you have a great implied odds hand, who cares if the blinds decide to come along? Get in cheap, stack fish anyway. [/ QUOTE ] It's easier to stack fish HU rather than 4-way
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
