#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: hawt or not?
Since I sincerely doubt you'd check a K or a 5 twice, but it's quite concievable that he did, can't an opponent who reads hands well 3-bet you here a lot?
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: hawt or not?
vs this villain this is perfectly fine.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: hawt or not?
i don't see the value unless he is bet-calling A-high, which seems very unlikely.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: hawt or not?
i seriously have no idea, this is just weird.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: hawt or not?
I can see him folding a better J here from time to time. I doubt it`s worth it.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: hawt or not?
ya villain is a clown who cant read hands.
he snapcalled Qhi, still not sure if its good, against him i think it is |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: hawt or not?
fine as long as he doesnt have a bet-3bet bluff trigger
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: hawt or not?
[ QUOTE ]
i seriously have no idea, this is just weird. [/ QUOTE ] i would have written this exactly. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: hawt or not?
this is awesome wiht QJ
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: hawt or not?
[ QUOTE ]
this is awesome wiht any J [/ QUOTE ] if the villain is bad since this is so weird, you will get called by A high a lot. |
|
|