#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
4 betting is fine, but just calling and making some plays post flop will put opp in a tougher spot imo.
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] the pot is offering 2:1. around 600 in the pot we have to call 310 if we put the player on JJ+;AK we have 40-60 % equity if he has KK,AK. 37-63 %. but i he makes this play with QQ+, you have only 30-70% against KK+ its 18-82 % desaster i gave him the QQ+ (maybe KK+) so there is no call here. we need 33% for a call .... [/ QUOTE ] Against QQ+ we have 31% equity which makes it a slightly bad call. Since that range is ridic tight and should only be used to make my point we have way more equity than that. It's a no brainer call. Stop being retards. [/ QUOTE ] not my fight but keep in mind... [ QUOTE ] I am a TAG, almost nit (19/16). [/ QUOTE ] |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
ROFMAO at this thread, this is sooo standard. Definitely do not fold after you 4-bet. If this had been button steal vs. resteal I might call occasionally in position, but with a player in the middle you have to 4-bet/call a shove.
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
exactly he is tight:
AK - AA: 7-93 % equity AK - KK: 30-70 AK - QQ: 43-57 AK - JJ: 43-57 43% is not a coin flip. dont like that play against a tight opponent its a loser. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
[ QUOTE ]
So OP, can you show these fools I am right? [/ QUOTE ] http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/po...oard=microplnl |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
[ QUOTE ]
So OP, can you show these fools I am right? [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] he had JJ, [/ QUOTE ] lol |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
his range isnt polarized bc sometimes he turns AJ into a bluff as well as 56
either way this is super standard...wtf at 12 open uTG though? |
|
|