|
|
#11
06-11-2005, 01:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: question about the value of \"sub-blocks\"
Some in this thread think he made this move for table image, but this is not the case, correct? He basically feels that risk (and consequences) of losing is not as great as the reward of getting the big stack? I know that is massively oversimplified, but I am just trying to begin to understand what he means.
|
|
|
Threaded Mode