Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Legislation
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: what next
reraise 1 50.00%
call 1 50.00%
fold 0 0%
Voters: 2. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 09-27-2007, 11:16 AM
PLO8FaceKilla PLO8FaceKilla is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 560
Default Re: Not in today\'s issue

Let's see the link about this buddy
  #12  
Old 09-27-2007, 11:24 AM
DeadMoneyDad DeadMoneyDad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 814
Default Re: Not in today\'s issue

[ QUOTE ]
Let's see the link about this buddy

[/ QUOTE ]

You replied to me and I provided a link.???

D$D
  #13  
Old 09-27-2007, 11:25 AM
PLO8FaceKilla PLO8FaceKilla is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 560
Default Re: Not in today\'s issue

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Let's see the link about this buddy

[/ QUOTE ]

You replied to me and I provided a link.???

D$D

[/ QUOTE ]
oh my bad... not you..

the guy who appears to be trolling is the one that i wanted the link from.
  #14  
Old 09-27-2007, 11:50 AM
chrisptp chrisptp is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: midwest
Posts: 80
Default Re: Not in today\'s issue

they may be referring to what bloomberg mentioned in an article on the iMEGA suit yesterday:

The Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve are drafting regulations to implement the law. The U.S. Office of Management and Budget on Sept. 25 approved draft regulations to implement the measure, according to its Web site.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...d=ajccXRa1BsOg
  #15  
Old 09-27-2007, 12:26 PM
MLSchaff MLSchaff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 352
Default Re: Not in today\'s issue

[ QUOTE ]
they may be referring to what bloomberg mentioned in an article on the iMEGA suit yesterday:

The Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve are drafting regulations to implement the law. The U.S. Office of Management and Budget on Sept. 25 approved draft regulations to implement the measure, according to its Web site.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...d=ajccXRa1BsOg

[/ QUOTE ]

The OMB isn't the department that would actually be putting out the regs, correct? So maybe this means that OMB has drafted their end of the regs and presented tham to Treasury, but that is only one component of the reg process which could still have a long way to go?
  #16  
Old 09-27-2007, 12:45 PM
Berge20 Berge20 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Grinding Away
Posts: 4,989
Default Re: Not in today\'s issue

I am under the impression that all drafts go through OMB after the agency (treasury in this case) puts them together.
  #17  
Old 09-27-2007, 01:02 PM
MiltonFriedman MiltonFriedman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Waaay down below
Posts: 1,627
Default Re: Not in today\'s issue

Correct.

(As for PLOFaceoff or whatever, I was not 'trolling" with the original post. There is no link because I was emailed by iMEGA with their own updates. What I posted came from their own email update, with an appropriate disclaimer as to clear misinformation. I was trying to decipher what iMEGA was trying to say, since what they actually said was nonsense.)

I think Berge is right and that OMB clearance also is the final step before publication, in the Federal Register for proposed Regs.

The Sky will fall soon, just not today, apparently.
  #18  
Old 09-27-2007, 05:37 PM
DeadMoneyDad DeadMoneyDad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 814
Default Re: Not in today\'s issue

[ QUOTE ]
I am under the impression that all drafts go through OMB after the agency (treasury in this case) puts them together.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes having had to put my name on a regulation published in the Fed Reg. OMB coordinates the show. With any regulation there is usually some sort of data collection or form involved all of which don't go anywhere unless OMB says grace over them.


D$D
  #19  
Old 09-27-2007, 05:41 PM
Wynton Wynton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: coping with the apokerlypse
Posts: 5,123
Default Re: Not in today\'s issue

I thought that the reason the OMB had to look over all regulations was to perform an analysis of any costs that are involved. I don't think this means that the OMB has to approve, though.
  #20  
Old 09-27-2007, 06:03 PM
DeadMoneyDad DeadMoneyDad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 814
Default Re: Not in today\'s issue

[ QUOTE ]
I thought that the reason the OMB had to look over all regulations was to perform an analysis of any costs that are involved. I don't think this means that the OMB has to approve, though.

[/ QUOTE ]

There are a number of laws like the paperwork reduction act just to name one that allow OMB to play in these matters. Budget issues are a concern but even OMB's budget numbers are subject to scrunity. So it has more to do with existing laws affecting the running of the Federal Gov't that fall to OMB to "enforce", than striaght budget issues. You can have a reg with no budget issues and still have OMB at the table.


D$D
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.