Nath....

[entertainme]

[ QUOTE ]

To clarify my opinion on this:

I think punishing nath for his so-called "trolling" was not appropriate.

I think perma-banning here was not appropriate.

I think banning for creating Jew-Rollo was appropriate.

I've suggested to jurollo that in the future he allow other mods to make decisions regarding matters he's involved in.

[/ QUOTE ]

Agreed.

[Ryan Beal]

citanul is right...

from ItalianFX's thread in AtF:
[ QUOTE ]
there is a longstanding rule concerning moderators dealing with posters who personally interact with them. moderators are not supposed to handle posters who are insulting/attacking them at all, unless it is totally out of line of the T&C of the site. moderators are supposed to defer to other moderators of the forum they are being "attacked" in, if possible, or to the administrators. if the behavior becomes unarguably bad, the moderator could take action.

[/ QUOTE ]

Anyone object to putting something similar in the sticky?

[Mat Sklansky]

Ryan Beajew

that's a good one, right?

[private joker]

I'm still amazed nobody has come up with Private Jewker yet. I mean come on, people, softball!

[citanul]

ryan,

please to be allowing durron to create a citanulisright gimmick account with access to the mod forum, which he will use only to post here. it has great potential.

c

[MrWookie]

I don't think we should make that a hard and fast rule. I think that mods, if they're taking action against a poster who's "trolling" them, should be encouraged to consult another mod, but I think in instances of racism, death threats, and other flagrant T&C violations, the mod can ban first and ask questions later. It's not like a ban can't be overturned.

[Chump Change]

LOL MR JEWKIE

[Mike Haven]

Too far, CC.

[El Diablo]

Mat Sklanskike,

I think Ryan Beajew is so-so.

[El Diablo]

Kike Heeben,

I don't think CC's was too far.