Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > High Stakes Limit
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 11-05-2007, 09:50 AM
doublebluff doublebluff is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 39
Default Re: Observer Q about Papawarbucks hand 200/400

sorry double post
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 11-05-2007, 10:24 AM
sup_bro sup_bro is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 94
Default Re: Observer Q about Papawarbucks hand 200/400

not at all trying to hijack this thread but some of you are referring to actnjunkie as "SHE"...who is she?? just curious....
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-05-2007, 10:35 AM
WillyT WillyT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: I wonder what my next thought will be?
Posts: 551
Default Re: Observer Q about Papawarbucks hand 200/400

"not at all trying to hijack this thread but some of you are referring to actnjunkie as "SHE"...who is she?? just curious.... "

Brandi?
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 11-05-2007, 09:00 PM
DeathDonkey DeathDonkey is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: DeucesCracked - Serious Game
Posts: 6,426
Default Re: Observer Q about Papawarbucks hand 200/400

Since its common knowledge its Chantel.

-DeathDonkey
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 11-05-2007, 09:20 PM
WillyT WillyT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: I wonder what my next thought will be?
Posts: 551
Default Re: Observer Q about Papawarbucks hand 200/400

Oh, right. I couldn't remember which one.

Thanks,
Bill
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 11-05-2007, 11:31 PM
Schneids Schneids is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Blogging live from MN!
Posts: 6,483
Default Re: Observer Q about Papawarbucks hand 200/400

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
not if she pays off with K high and that is the majority of her range...

[/ QUOTE ]

hmmm, i just stoved it. Still think you lose money on the bet, but it's closer than i'd originally thought. If she occasionally bluffs k-hi when checked to, then i guess betting is ok.

[/ QUOTE ]

Combo of:

1) Weight it more heavily towards K-high than ace high since most of the reasonably big aces she'll cap preflop against me.
2) Betting takes away me having to make a decision if I check and she bets. You can never be too certain if it's a 0% or 5% or 20% likelihood she'll bet a K-high on the river.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 11-06-2007, 06:52 AM
Enon Enon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,056
Default Re: Observer Q about Papawarbucks hand 200/400

[ QUOTE ]
Since its common knowledge its Chantel.

-DeathDonkey

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm under impression various people play on it these days.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 11-06-2007, 11:14 AM
Mig Mig is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 766
Default Re: Observer Q about Papawarbucks hand 200/400

I thought PS had a policy against account sharing ? Didn't they ban some accounts for that reason ?
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 11-06-2007, 04:05 PM
MicroBob MicroBob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The cat is back by popular demand.
Posts: 29,344
Default Re: Observer Q about Papawarbucks hand 200/400

not that I'm aware of.
Letting somebody else play on your account is evidently okay I think.
YOU have more than one account of your own is not allowed though.

I believe they have specifically said that they allow letting others play on your account because there really isn't anything they can do to prevent it.
My memory might be off about this one though.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 11-06-2007, 05:38 PM
SpaceAce SpaceAce is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,017
Default Re: Observer Q about Papawarbucks hand 200/400

[ QUOTE ]
not that I'm aware of.
Letting somebody else play on your account is evidently okay I think.
YOU have more than one account of your own is not allowed though.

I believe they have specifically said that they allow letting others play on your account because there really isn't anything they can do to prevent it.
My memory might be off about this one though.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, I believe this was settled by the Great Monkey Email some time back. PokerStars indicated that they could not be held responsible for players letting loose-aggressive pet monkeys play on the players' accounts.

SpaceAce
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.