|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: the proof is in the pudding
[ QUOTE ]
such a howl and crescendo.. yes, indeed, the whole gist of the post was missed; and, in being missed, underscored... [/ QUOTE ] So enlighten us, oh masterful picker of the 61% rate. What exactly was the point? You post a 19-game sample. My opening five weeks from the NFL last year (Performify's Pigskin Picks, through Week 5, all posted on this forum, all against Widely Available lines and all with units tracked and posted before games): 9-5-1. Excluding the tie, that's a 64.2% win percentage. If you take through week six, seventeen games, it drops to a measly 59%. What does a small sample prove? What if you even jump to the end of both seasons and look at my total weighted record? I've got publicly available picks against widely available lines for the last two seasons, winning seasons both, against WA lines (i'll repeat). But still, what does it matter? If you want to jump to MMA, something that doesn't directly compare to spread picks, but still, I'm 18-8 up double digit units for the last four events. Weeee, variance is fun! So back to the matter, what's your point? Are you disappointed that you're not being welcomed as an expert, and still seeking that affection and respect that you crave? Did you miss the parade we threw in your honor the first week you arrived? Or the key to the forums which Sklansky himself enscribed and presented? Truly, you are god's gift to handicappers and we shall shower you with adoration every time you weigh in on a post. -P |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: the proof is in the pudding
I posted a thread earlier about how variance had my ROI 4x what it should've been. WHERES MY LOVE?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: the proof is in the pudding
[ QUOTE ]
I posted a thread earlier about how variance had my ROI 4x what it should've been. WHERES MY LOVE? [/ QUOTE ] nobody cares about you, ldo it's about time Performify takes his turn in what people do best around here |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: the proof is in the pudding
I went 4 for 4 the opening week of the NFL.
IIRC I think I went 10 for 12 or something ridiculous the opening week of the NCAA-F season. I posted all those picks on here. Evidently, I should only be betting in opening weeks. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: the proof is in the pudding
[ QUOTE ]
I went 4 for 4 the opening week of the NFL. IIRC I think I went 10 for 12 or something ridiculous the opening week of the NCAA-F season. I posted all those picks on here. Evidently, I should only be betting in opening weeks. [/ QUOTE ] Or become a tout after opening week! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: the proof is in the pudding
LESSON: If you are very selective about your bets, you can hit alot of them.....Thremp already showed us this a few weeks ago
My personal problem with your post is that you are cherry-picking your 'picks'...ie outright lying |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: the proof is in the pudding
That was a pretty sick burn. Ups P.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: the proof is in the pudding
I had a run where I was winning 17BB/100 over 100+ hands on limit poker where the supposed max sustainable win-rate is around 2 or MAYBE 3BB/100.
Obviously I have proven these claims of max win-rate of 2BB/100 to be horribly incorrect. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: the proof is in the pudding
21-10-1 in 2p2 college bowl picks last year, won 4 of last 5 year before that only loss due to over 3ot PSU game with multiple missed XPx and chip-shot FGs, won both PotY. 25-11 is like 69% over a solid sample of bowl games over 2 years!
I want my autographed key to the Forums, dammit! ...or at least an E:60 segment about how i pwn DrBob during bowl season. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: the proof is in the pudding
My first posting in SB was last year for NCAAF Week 1. I went 8-0? Anyone remember that? Obviously I am a 100% capper.
|
|
|