some advice to the newer bbv4l posters

[Chopper Dave]

[RedJoker]

Gild, nh. I was thinking the same thing about improving BBV4L, I've got a fairly long tutorial on MSPaint written up, need to finish it off though. I'll start a separate thread so this one doesn't get derailed and there can be discussion afterwards without fear off TEH STICKY.

I'm with Nath about the selective reading thing. I usually only read threads from recognized OPs or threads with >100 replies. Otherwise there has to be a very good title unless I'm bored.

No ignore list yet though.

[Gildwulf]

[ QUOTE ]
Gild, nh. I was thinking the same thing about improving BBV4L, I've got a fairly long tutorial on MSPaint written up, need to finish it off though. I'll start a separate thread so this one doesn't get derailed and there can be discussion afterwards without fear off TEH STICKY.

I'm with Nath about the selective reading thing. I usually only read threads from recognized OPs or threads with >100 replies. Otherwise there has to be a very good title unless I'm bored.

No ignore list yet though.

[/ QUOTE ]

unfortunately I can't really use the ignore function

[ImsaKidd]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Gild, nh. I was thinking the same thing about improving BBV4L, I've got a fairly long tutorial on MSPaint written up, need to finish it off though. I'll start a separate thread so this one doesn't get derailed and there can be discussion afterwards without fear off TEH STICKY.

I'm with Nath about the selective reading thing. I usually only read threads from recognized OPs or threads with >100 replies. Otherwise there has to be a very good title unless I'm bored.

No ignore list yet though.

[/ QUOTE ]

unfortunately I can't really use the ignore function

[/ QUOTE ]

Do you just ban posters you want to ignore?

[nath]

[ QUOTE ]
I'm with Nath about the selective reading thing. I usually only read threads from recognized OPs or threads with >100 replies. Otherwise there has to be a very good title unless I'm bored.

[/ QUOTE ]
what sucks is when i see a thread that seems stupid at first glance and 3-4 days later has like 200 replies, so i open it, and it's still stupid

[nath]

[ QUOTE ]
unfortunately I can't really use the ignore function

[/ QUOTE ]
i can just give you my list and you can ban everyone on it

[IronFly]

[ QUOTE ]

what sucks is when i see a thread that seems stupid at first glance and 3-4 days later has like 200 replies, so i open it, and it's still stupid

[/ QUOTE ]

And 4 out of 5 posts are LDO, QFT, and ban.

[T-God]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

what sucks is when i see a thread that seems stupid at first glance and 3-4 days later has like 200 replies, so i open it, and it's still stupid

[/ QUOTE ]

And 4 out of 5 posts are LDO, QFT, and ban.

[/ QUOTE ]
Ugh. Are you guys like 80 years old? Stop bitching so much. It's BBV4L FFS. Everything here is stupid, that's the point.

P.S. GO SENS

[kniper]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm with Nath about the selective reading thing. I usually only read threads from recognized OPs or threads with >100 replies. Otherwise there has to be a very good title unless I'm bored.

[/ QUOTE ]
what sucks is when i see a thread that seems stupid at first glance and 3-4 days later has like 200 replies, so i open it, and it's still stupid

[/ QUOTE ]

show us your list.

also, someone else say the same thing in case im on naths ignore list already

[doubLe a tom]

Spechel Edd, you're an [censored]. Your stupid posts that have the same pictures a thousand [censored] times is not cool and/or funny. It makes my computer freeze and its annoying as hell. Mazda6's posts put you to shame. Stop being a [censored] moron. Thanks.