Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-14-2007, 11:10 PM
toddxlogan toddxlogan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 308
Default Stars 50NL - Aces c/rd on a nasty board, interesting . . .

Hi All-

Thought this one was pretty interesting. I think my actions on every street (save preflop) are pretty debatable (bad? my initial reaction was that i butchered it, but looking at it more and more I can't really decide), and i'm very interested to hear some other thoughts on the hand.

I'll post my thoughts once some responses get going; don't want to bias responses yet. FWIW, over 60 hands, villain is 28/18/(5/na/na). Table is nitty though so I think that just means he doesn't totally ignore table conditions. At the time I think i'm running somewhat similarly to him pf, maybe 25/20 or something, but have shown down a couple decent hands for a couple decent pots and also got caught with my hand in the cookie jar once on a failed double barrel. Alas, I digress . . .

Poker Stars, $0.25/$0.50 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 6 Players
LegoPoker Hand History Converter

Hero (CO): $79.65
BTN: $43.20
SB: $19.10
BB: $58.55
UTG: $24.10
MP: $53.30

Pre-Flop: A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] dealt to Hero (CO)
UTG calls $0.50, MP calls $0.50, <font color="red">Hero raises to $3</font>, 4 folds, MP calls $2.50

Flop: ($7.25) 7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 4[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 5[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (2 Players)
MP checks, <font color="red">Hero bets $4.50</font>, <font color="red">MP raises to $12</font>, Hero calls $7.50

Turn: ($31.25) 6[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (2 Players)
<font color="red">MP bets $15</font>, Hero calls $15

River: ($61.25) 5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 Players)
<font color="red">MP bets $23.30 and is All-In</font>, Hero folds

Results: $61.25 Pot ($2.95 Rake)
MP mucked and WON $58.30 (+$28.30 NET)

Let me know what you think.

Todd
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-14-2007, 11:17 PM
mugatu668 mugatu668 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,260
Default Re: Stars 50NL - Aces c/rd on a nasty board, interesting . . .

bet more on flop.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-14-2007, 11:18 PM
iheartponeez iheartponeez is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Where Brooklyn At?
Posts: 597
Default Re: Stars 50NL - Aces c/rd on a nasty board, interesting . . .

I think you could make a case for shoving the flop (also, you need to bet much closer to pot size on such a wet board), since it's a drawy board and you're probably ahead just barely, but once the turn hits...well, every draw came in at once. Time to fold.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-14-2007, 11:20 PM
toddxlogan toddxlogan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 308
Default Re: Stars 50NL - Aces c/rd on a nasty board, interesting . . .

[ QUOTE ]
I think you could make a case for shoving the flop (also, you need to bet much closer to pot size on such a wet board), since it's a drawy board and you're probably ahead just barely, but once the turn hits...well, every draw came in at once. Time to fold.

[/ QUOTE ]

You notice I have the Ac, right?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-14-2007, 11:22 PM
toddxlogan toddxlogan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 308
Default Re: Stars 50NL - Aces c/rd on a nasty board, interesting . . .

[ QUOTE ]
bet more on flop.

[/ QUOTE ]

Ok. Pretend I bet what, $1 more on flop. Maybe $1.50 if we are full potting but i basically never fullpot c-bet, so meh, that would stick out strangely. Regardless, that means his c-bet is approx. $2 bigger probably. Now what?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-14-2007, 11:26 PM
ajml ajml is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,000
Default Re: Stars 50NL - Aces c/rd on a nasty board, interesting . . .

I think I would probably shove the flop and make him pay for any draw there. If i called the flop here, which I would do sometimes, I think the turn would have to be a fold.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-14-2007, 11:27 PM
iheartponeez iheartponeez is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Where Brooklyn At?
Posts: 597
Default Re: Stars 50NL - Aces c/rd on a nasty board, interesting . . .

[ QUOTE ]

You notice I have the Ac, right?

[/ QUOTE ]

I didn't. In that case I think pushing the flop might be an okay plan. Betting more on the flop makes the raise more, which makes it easier for you to commit all-in while you're ahead.

I don't know if shoving is really the best line, so I'd want to hear other opinions.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-15-2007, 09:29 PM
toddxlogan toddxlogan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 308
Default Re: Stars 50NL - Aces c/rd on a nasty board, interesting . . .

[ QUOTE ]
I think I would probably shove the flop and make him pay for any draw there. If i called the flop here, which I would do sometimes, I think the turn would have to be a fold.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, I I think a flop shove is probably the more optimal play, but I just can't make up my mind for sure. The problem is that at best i'm hoping to be 50/50 if he calls, and most of the time, or at least a lot of the time, I am absolutely slaughtered. So the plan with the hand was to flat call, hope for a turn brick, and evaluate his action from there, when his semibluffing (?) hand has considerably less equity. Might have been a bad plan, meh.

Anyhow, once I get to the turn, its far from a brick...its like, the opposite. Buuuut now I pick up the nut club redraw, and I felt at this point like hes probably paying off. Also, his bet is less than halfpot, which is interesting. Scared? Couldnt tell. But made me want to see a showdown a little more. Retrospectively speaking, his play is consistent with a middling club flush that had a pair/straight draw on the flop, which almost makes me wonder if a TURN shove might not have been terrible.... my play looks exactly like AcKc up to that point, he didn't seem like a showdown monkey, and I wouldn't need too much FE for that to be a profitable play.... Hmm. Interesting.

Obviously cant call river shove, dont think. He cant play a 1pair hand like this...... I think.

Ahhh...this game....
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-16-2007, 12:37 AM
geekylucas geekylucas is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 48
Default Re: Stars 50NL - Aces c/rd on a nasty board, interesting . . .

Thinking about villains action PF (limp-call) - what types of hands she would do this with.

I presume only speculative hands. Small suited connectors and pocket pairs?

I suspect villain wanted to see the flop cheap and then check-raised us when they flopped big. 2 pair or a set on the flop, no?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-18-2007, 07:51 AM
Tempel Tempel is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 27
Default Re: Stars 50NL - Aces c/rd on a nasty board, interesting . . .

Since both turn &amp; river are horrible cards for you given his re-raise on flop you should fold turn here.

33,44,55,66,77,88, about any low sc and 2 clubs beat you here. all of them could easily fit into the limp-calling range pf.

As for the FS youre getting 1:3 going to the river, and you'll make your flush about 1:4.. so thats not good enough.

Fold flop is to weak though, i dont hate the call, but i think i prefer to shove here to make him pay if he has a draw. fist of all i think you have to almost pot here since the board is so coordinated..

Then as played, i think i'd fold turn since 6c completes every draw out there.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.