Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Medium Stakes Limit
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 04-16-2007, 07:45 AM
Carmine Carmine is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,250
Default Re: PF Time Pot Scenario

[ QUOTE ]
All i was saying is if you have an option to stay out of that time pot and pay your own time you should stay out. If you must be in the time pot then AA-JJ is playable but not much else unless the whole table understands it and tightens up and you can steal blinds with all kind of crap.

[/ QUOTE ]

Do you really think a time pot is a bad idea. Considering you will be involved in substantially less pots than your opponents. I would think the situation described comes up rarely and when it does you simply adjust accordingly.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-16-2007, 08:39 AM
Grease Grease is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 2,421
Default Re: PF Time Pot Scenario

I'm usually the initiator of time pots whenever possible since

A) The table usually doesn't care that time is being taken and plays like it's any other hand and

B) I win far fewer pots on average than the typical 10/20 donk.

I have found that I pay a small fraction of the time that I usually should when I do time pots, but my sample size is small, and I can understand the bad consequences it might have on the game while time is being collected.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-16-2007, 10:35 AM
3rdCheckRaise 3rdCheckRaise is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: sit 10
Posts: 769
Default Re: PF Time Pot Scenario

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
All i was saying is if you have an option to stay out of that time pot and pay your own time you should stay out. If you must be in the time pot then AA-JJ is playable but not much else unless the whole table understands it and tightens up and you can steal blinds with all kind of crap.

[/ QUOTE ]

Do you really think a time pot is a bad idea. Considering you will be involved in substantially less pots than your opponents. I would think the situation described comes up rarely and when it does you simply adjust accordingly.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think you missed my point again. I play in time pot games all the time but then again those games are at higher stakes and time charge is not as big or a portion of the pot. I think time pot is a really good idea for 30-60 games and up but in this case you are paying more then 1BB from the pot and that kills the game.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-16-2007, 02:32 PM
jkamowitz jkamowitz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,229
Default Re: PF Time Pot Scenario

I agree with 3rdcheckraise here. While I'm usually the dude that runs the time at 20/40 (where time pots are max 35) at 10/20 it's really pointless.

While yes you may save 5/half hour the idea of bringing even more nittiness to an already incredibly nitty passive game is counter-intuitive. You save 5$ but cost yourself a fun table.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.