tubasteve's NL100 last 100k hand checkup

[pineapple888]

[ QUOTE ]
pretty good numbers. i don't know why 22/18 is considered too tight?

[/ QUOTE ]

For the same reason a river AF of 2 is considered too passive.

But there is more than one way to get the cheddar.

[Hince]

Your river aggression seems surprisingly low.

I'm also wondering why you would spend this much time at 100NL when you obviously have a solid understanding of the game.

[fitnessfreak]

absolutely nothing wrong with your river AF. dont know why everyone is going on about it. try to get your w$wsf up higher and you will be well on your way.

[Xanta]

This thread's died a little and I don't really wanna start my own, so I'll post my first 100k hands of NL50 + here. I have improved a lot but obv there's still plenty of room for work, anyone spot anything glaring?

[Dire]

Xanta, extremely low W$WSF mixed with rather high W$SD. Can't usually say much from just stats but looks like you're giving up too easily, missing lots of double barrel / semi bluff spots. Or playing set/fold with pocket pairs from the SB against a CO opener who's stealing 40%. Stuff like that.

[Xanta]

That's my general idea of my game right now. I think that style is more correct at the micros but I haven't adjusted as I've moved up and the adverse effects on my winrate are obvious. Gotta learn me some small ball.

[CITIZEN_114]

in general, yes. A second barrel is burning money, but not always. Learn to spot the guys that are floating you and don't give up too quick.

nice results though and no big mistakes at first sight.

edit:and tubasteve, you pay less rake then me (iPoker)(and I play like 19/16fwiw).

[Isura]

Don't waste time on stats. Improve hand reading and the money will come.

[futuredoc85]

[ QUOTE ]
absolutely nothing wrong with your river AF. dont know why everyone is going on about it. try to get your w$wsf up higher and you will be well on your way.

[/ QUOTE ]

meh i think the 2nd decimal in fold SB to steal could use some work