Who is the smarter poker player, Player A or Player B?

[dacwbys]

Both Players have Full Time jobs, play at brick and mortar tournaments with no more than a $50.00 Buy In generally with an average of 30-50 Players.

Player A - Plays to Cash (Passive) and ends up doing so in more tourneys and returns a profit over the course of a year but never wins one.

Player B - Plays to Win (Aggressive) and ends up doing so in about 1 tourney out of every 10 or so but is in the negative at the end of the year.

I look forward to your responses. [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]

[shaundeeb]

stupid thread.

[Imrahil]

Wrong forum buddy. Belongs in the Special Skalansky question forum.

[ebepse]

so B gets first in 10% of the tournaments he plays but loses money overall? zomg

[UnblinkingEye]

[ QUOTE ]
so B gets first in 10% of the tournaments he plays but loses money overall? zomg

[/ QUOTE ]

My feelings exactly. How is it mathematically possible to win 1/10 of your MTT's over a year and have a negative ROI?

[LooseCaller]

neither. because they're playing low stakes live tournaments. and listening to overweight middle aged men explain their horribly flawed poker strategy, in between incredibly graphic descriptions of the anatomy of any woman who happens to come into view and idiotic discussions of sports, makes me want to kill myself.

[FooSH]

The one with the hottest chick LDO

[Bad Beat Maker]

[x] OP ruins his first post in effect making horrible first impression.

Variance: Invited to join my club?

[BenJammin']

1. bump
2. ban
3. kill
4. profit