Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Science, Math, and Philosophy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-14-2007, 01:08 PM
vhawk01 vhawk01 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: GHoFFANMWYD
Posts: 9,098
Default High Dive Problem

This is at least nominally a physics problem, but I suck at physics. What I'm wondering is, is there some reasonable assumptions or estimations I can make in order to try and determine the minimum depth of water, x, necessary for a safe dive from some height, y? I know there is some technique involved, so this will be a crude approximation. Anything +/- ten feet should be close enough.

Yes, this is related to a drunken bar bet and no, you do not need to worry about paralyzing vhawk with too conservative an answer.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-14-2007, 01:40 PM
btmagnetw btmagnetw is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,713
Default Re: High Dive Problem

a good benchmark is 1 ft of water per 10 ft of dive. good luck.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-14-2007, 02:01 PM
vhawk01 vhawk01 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: GHoFFANMWYD
Posts: 9,098
Default Re: High Dive Problem

[ QUOTE ]
a good benchmark is 1 ft of water per 10 ft of dive. good luck.

[/ QUOTE ]

[img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] Like I said, yer not gonna kill me, I'm not actually diving into anything.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-14-2007, 06:10 PM
samsonite2100 samsonite2100 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Bustin\' Makes Me Feel Good
Posts: 1,092
Default Re: High Dive Problem

[ QUOTE ]
a good benchmark is 1 ft of water per 10 ft of dive. good luck.

[/ QUOTE ]

Unless you're joking, this is obviously incorrect.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-14-2007, 06:19 PM
Neuge Neuge is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 784
Default Re: High Dive Problem

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
a good benchmark is 1 ft of water per 10 ft of dive. good luck.

[/ QUOTE ]

Unless you're joking, this is obviously incorrect.

[/ QUOTE ]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jSXzBSPQ50k (rickroll?)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-14-2007, 07:47 PM
samsonite2100 samsonite2100 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Bustin\' Makes Me Feel Good
Posts: 1,092
Default Re: High Dive Problem

I didn't realize the question was "what's the minimum depth of water necessary for a belly flop into a kiddie pool perched on top of a bunch of foam." In that case, the correct answer is "no water."
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-14-2007, 10:06 PM
Siegmund Siegmund is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,850
Default Re: High Dive Problem

Assuming we are talking about "serious" diving, where you actually try to enter the water cleanly and get to a reasonable depth, I would take as a starting point:

Your speed of entry into the water is going to be roughly proportional to the square root of the height from which you dive;
Diving from the side of the pool is marginally safe in about 5 feet of water (dangerous enough so that you'll be told not to do it, but safe enough you can if you arent trying to dive super-deep.) Your center of mass is between 3 and 4 feet above the water when standing beside the pool.

Sooo... I will propose 2.5*sqrt(height of platform + 4) as a first attempt.

In the real world, I've seen 12-foot high dives above 12 feet of water (my formula says 10 feet is safe) and 30-foot high dives above 15 feet of water (my formula says 14.5 is safe).

My understanding is that divers actually cease holding their "deep-diving" configuration as soon as their feet are in the water, and either spread out into a higher-resistance body form, or actively swim for the surface -- my impression is that dives from considerably higher than 30 feet are done into 15 feet of water.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-15-2007, 03:01 AM
vhawk01 vhawk01 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: GHoFFANMWYD
Posts: 9,098
Default Re: High Dive Problem

[ QUOTE ]
Assuming we are talking about "serious" diving, where you actually try to enter the water cleanly and get to a reasonable depth, I would take as a starting point:

Your speed of entry into the water is going to be roughly proportional to the square root of the height from which you dive;
Diving from the side of the pool is marginally safe in about 5 feet of water (dangerous enough so that you'll be told not to do it, but safe enough you can if you arent trying to dive super-deep.) Your center of mass is between 3 and 4 feet above the water when standing beside the pool.

Sooo... I will propose 2.5*sqrt(height of platform + 4) as a first attempt.

In the real world, I've seen 12-foot high dives above 12 feet of water (my formula says 10 feet is safe) and 30-foot high dives above 15 feet of water (my formula says 14.5 is safe).

My understanding is that divers actually cease holding their "deep-diving" configuration as soon as their feet are in the water, and either spread out into a higher-resistance body form, or actively swim for the surface -- my impression is that dives from considerably higher than 30 feet are done into 15 feet of water.

[/ QUOTE ]

Excellent, thank you. This is along the lines of what I was looking for. You may have just won me a free round.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-15-2007, 03:02 AM
vhawk01 vhawk01 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: GHoFFANMWYD
Posts: 9,098
Default Re: High Dive Problem

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
a good benchmark is 1 ft of water per 10 ft of dive. good luck.

[/ QUOTE ]

Unless you're joking, this is obviously incorrect.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, I think he was joking/trying to kill me. Its cool either way.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.