|
|
#11
11-13-2007, 01:38 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50NL AK
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Today a guy 4-bet me with AK, and had to just call my QQ shove. That's the situation you don't want to be in, because you're committed to calling from behind. [/ QUOTE ] Considering how much AK benefits from seeing the turn and river, isn't calling and then folding the flop a worse play? [/ QUOTE ] I think it is. 
|
|
#12
11-13-2007, 01:46 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 50NL AK
I think your line is fine. 4bet would be more standard
|
|
#13
11-13-2007, 01:48 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 50NL AK
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Today a guy 4-bet me with AK, and had to just call my QQ shove. That's the situation you don't want to be in, because you're committed to calling from behind. [/ QUOTE ] Considering how much AK benefits from seeing the turn and river, isn't calling and then folding the flop a worse play? [/ QUOTE ] I think it is. [/ QUOTE ] Are you talking about the hand I posted? Do you think I should have pushed pf?
|
|
#14
11-13-2007, 01:59 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 50NL AK
IMO calling is fine and frankly calling or raising depends on stats for me. Folding though rare is also possible against some kinda extreme villians.
In general in coser to stealing spots against somewhat normal opponents (though things are still opponent dependent) I 4bet/call a shove OOP. IP it gets mixed up between that and calling. I don't like just shoving on your 4bet unless you do that with big pairs and/or do it a lot when u 4bet. If your 4bet gets called it is not hard t play on flop. Get it all-in on A or K high flop (though I likely check the flop) and check/fold otherwise.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
