|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: maybe standard laydown with a flush, 25/50
Rich, idk the guy in question but lots of pps he could have often fold to a 2nd barrel.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: maybe standard laydown with a flush, 25/50
Hmm. It seems to me like the best case scenario for any one pair hand which the button called the flop with: the pfr folded, and the turn came an offsuit 2. If there isn't too much history, why would we expect him to fold a pair on the turn when there aren't actually very many strong hands we're representing at all?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: maybe standard laydown with a flush, 25/50
I would fold and leave the table, thats a sick lineup even if there is a fish
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: maybe standard laydown with a flush, 25/50
[ QUOTE ]
I would fold and leave the table, thats a sick lineup even if there is a fish [/ QUOTE ] disagree, but barely. one big fish is enough to feed a whole table. but agree that doesnt even look like a very good 100/200 table... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: maybe standard laydown with a flush, 25/50
You guys realize that isnt peachy, right? That table really isnt that bad.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: maybe standard laydown with a flush, 25/50
sam, urin, peachy and tsar is a tough lineup. and no, i didnt realise that wasnt peachy. that does change things, though. as i said, i'd play this table with a big fish, but it's not really on the good end of the spectrum....
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: maybe standard laydown with a flush, 25/50
[ QUOTE ]
I would fold and leave the table, thats a sick lineup even if there is a fish [/ QUOTE ] you;'re a vag, that table is not that bad |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: maybe standard laydown with a flush, 25/50
Guys help me to calculate this. Does A-high flush count as one? I mean when I put this to pokerstove is it enough to add A-high flush only once?
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: maybe standard laydown with a flush, 25/50
fold preflop.
|
|
|