Die Hard Trilogy Poll

[shant]

I'd like to see how these rate in order. Choose how you would rank them from best to worst.

.

[Frank TJ Mackey]

3, 1, 2 imo. First two can be interchanged but I like Samuel L.. Second one is CLEARLY the worst.

[diebitter]

moved to OOT, with [censored]'s knowledge.

[EPIC]

2nd is clearly the worst of the 3, it doesnt have the same buddy cop element going on as Bruce and the Family Matters guy and then Bruce and Mr. Snakes On a Plane.

The 1st actually has dramatic purpose throughout the entire movie intertwined well with the action, #2 focuses more so on just the action and just doesnt feel right compared to the other 2, and Vengence has all the right elements to make it a great action/buddy cop flick

[miajag]

2,3,1

[Kneel B4 Zod]

glad you started this poll. did you see the "Sequels" thread?

I couldn't believe people were sayind 2 was the best.

[Borodog]

For the record, I think the poll is proving my point, that the idea that it is "universally agreed" that 2 is the worst is incorrect.

I think 3 is the weakest film because the racial aspect seems ad hoc and forced.

[private joker]

I'd give Die Hard 1 a 10/10. One of the best Hollywood action blockbusters of all time. Die Hard 2: Die Harder is a 5/10. It doesn't hold up at all on repeated viewings, and Dennis Franz is annoying. Die Hard With a Vengeance has some entertaining scenes, but the plot is retarded and Jeremy Irons is a disappointingly bad villain. Nobody can live up to Alan Rickman -- I give that one a 6/10. So it's 1, 3, 2 for me.

I wish they had stopped after the first one.

[shant]

Borodog,

I'm confused. 2 of the 3 top leaders in votes have Die Hard 2 in last place.

[Borodog]

[ QUOTE ]
Borodog,

I'm confused. 2 of the 3 top leaders in votes have Die Hard 2 in last place.

[/ QUOTE ]

So what? Second place is that 3 is the worst. That's the whole point. It is far from "universally accepted" that 2 is the worst.