Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-25-2007, 11:29 AM
Kimpan Kimpan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: meatballs and blonde babes
Posts: 1,600
Default AKs, no cbet

Do I cbet this?
I figure I get called by a lot in his range..

PartyPoker $200 NL Hold'em <font color="#0000FF">(4 handed)</font> HandRecorder v0.9b

Stacks &amp; Stats
BU ($212.35)
BB ($229.55)
CO ($189.15) (28/18/3.31/27) (597h)
Hero ($245.15)

Preflop: Hero is SB with A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]
<font color="#FF0000">CO raises to $8</font>, <font color="#666666">1 folds</font>, <font color="#FF0000">Hero raises to $28</font>, <font color="#666666">1 folds</font>, CO calls $20.

Flop: ($58) 5[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 3[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 5[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
Hero checks, <font color="#FF0000">CO bets $30</font>, Hero folds.

Final Pot: $88.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-25-2007, 11:33 AM
Spy Dog Spy Dog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Beer tastes good
Posts: 5,193
Default Re: AKs, no cbet

Check-folding is OK. Cbetting probably isn't that great.

Check-calling is probably best, but can be tricky and needs postflop reads versus our opponent.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-25-2007, 11:36 AM
martijn martijn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: punishing minraises
Posts: 533
Default Re: AKs, no cbet

I just bet it, 40 looks good.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-25-2007, 11:44 AM
Spy Dog Spy Dog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Beer tastes good
Posts: 5,193
Default Re: AKs, no cbet

[ QUOTE ]
I just bet it, 40 looks good.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think every PP calls or raises this bet. I also think that every hand we dominate will fold or make a move, causing us to fold.

It's an ugly spot and c-betting is the easiest play, but not the most optimal.

I'd rather check-call. We give ourselves a chance to pair on the turn with very clean outs. Plus, he might check behind and continue checking until the river. Also, we can bluff certain opponents if a Queen or Jack hits.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-25-2007, 11:47 AM
Sorcerer808 Sorcerer808 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Folding the nuts for metagame
Posts: 481
Default Re: AKs, no cbet

I usually c/f against unknowns and bet against ppl whom I have history with and in the right circumstances. I find c/c a very interesting option, I'll try to experiment with it.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-25-2007, 11:52 AM
traz traz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sleeping on stacks
Posts: 19,775
Default Re: AKs, no cbet

I cf against most unknowns
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-25-2007, 12:19 PM
startrak startrak is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 195
Default Re: AKs, no cbet

i bet and shove alot of turns. check calling is worst option.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-25-2007, 12:21 PM
dragonystic dragonystic is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Omelettes FTW
Posts: 1,075
Default Re: AKs, no cbet

c/f looks perfectly fine here. a lot of his range will call, so id only cbet this if i was willing to double barrel.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-25-2007, 12:23 PM
Hattifnatt Hattifnatt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: FT
Posts: 8,202
Default Re: AKs, no cbet

c/f is perfectly fine, so is leading, c/c is bad.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-25-2007, 12:50 PM
Noam Chomsky Noam Chomsky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 919
Default Re: AKs, no cbet

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I just bet it, 40 looks good.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think every PP calls or raises this bet. I also think that every hand we dominate will fold or make a move, causing us to fold.

It's an ugly spot and c-betting is the easiest play, but not the most optimal.

I'd rather check-call. We give ourselves a chance to pair on the turn with very clean outs. Plus, he might check behind and continue checking until the river. Also, we can bluff certain opponents if a Queen or Jack hits.

[/ QUOTE ]

We give ourselves the same chance of hitting a pair by betting this flop and our bluffs on later streets are a lot more credible.

That said, I do agree with some of what you've said and I c/c here a certain percentage of the time. It's close to optimal against some opponents.

I also c/r against some, c/f against some and bet against some. Against this guy, looking at his stats only, I probably just bet it for value and may pay off a value bet/pick off a bluff somewhere along the way unimproved if I get called.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.