Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > 2+2 Communities > Other Other Topics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #331  
Old 11-26-2007, 01:55 AM
mrh86 mrh86 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Drinking like a fish
Posts: 1,128
Default Re: So I\'m going to Prison for 2 years

MuresanForMVP, you are given a chance to prove your coordination when you're suspected of drunk driving. If you pass the coordination tests flawlessly, you will most likely not be tested via breathalyzer. I've been in a situation where my friend who had not been drinking was pulled over while driving my car on the way home from AC. The car smelled strongly of alcohol, but he got out and performed coordination tests flawlessly and wasn't even tested via breathalyzer.

If you have been drinking though, and you suspect that you're under the legal limit, you have a right not to tell the officer that you've been drinking AND refuse coordination tests. You just can't refuse the breathalyzer.
Reply With Quote
  #332  
Old 11-26-2007, 01:57 AM
tuq tuq is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: god for Mike Haven
Posts: 13,313
Default Re: So I\'m going to Prison for 2 years

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
and for those of you saying 0.8 is a stupid arbitrary line - 0.8 is pretty drunk - it definitely affects your ability to drive. there have been many, many studies done on this (none of which i'm going to look up cuz i'm lazy).

[/ QUOTE ]
10 you are wrong
20 goto 10

This thread is like a very simple BASIC program.

[/ QUOTE ]

10 you are an old man
20 you have no friends, no life. probably not married but if you are you're definitely not getting any.
30 you spend 100% of your free time on 2+2
40 that is pretty pathetic

[/ QUOTE ]
Is this type of personal attack really necessary? My point was that your point about 0.8 (sic, but who cares, I got your point) definitively "affecting ability to drive" is wrong, it's been proven wrong, and we've been through this already. But I mean whatever, obviously attacking me as a person nullifies all of this.
Reply With Quote
  #333  
Old 11-26-2007, 01:59 AM
tuq tuq is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: god for Mike Haven
Posts: 13,313
Default Re: So I\'m going to Prison for 2 years

[ QUOTE ]
A cop has to have a reason to pull you over

[/ QUOTE ]
"LOL"
Reply With Quote
  #334  
Old 11-26-2007, 02:04 AM
MuresanForMVP MuresanForMVP is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: out there
Posts: 2,706
Default Re: So I\'m going to Prison for 2 years

[ QUOTE ]
MuresanForMVP, you are given a chance to prove your coordination when you're suspected of drunk driving. If you pass the coordination tests flawlessly, you will most likely not be tested via breathalyzer. I've been in a situation where my friend who had not been drinking was pulled over while driving my car on the way home from AC. The car smelled strongly of alcohol, but he got out and performed coordination tests flawlessly and wasn't even tested via breathalyzer.

If you have been drinking though, and you suspect that you're under the legal limit, you have a right not to tell the officer that you've been drinking AND refuse coordination tests. You just can't refuse the breathalyzer.

[/ QUOTE ]


The problem with this is that if the officer wants you to fail this test then he will find a way. and like you said, you can't refuse a breathalyzer. Actually you can, but then your license is automatically suspended, but w/e. I think my idea is far better than the current system. Cops can almost literally pull you over for any reason, and often do if they know the bars just got out and you look of college-age or whatever. It appears that you're putting FFAARRRR too much confidence in the police to use discretion in these situations.
Reply With Quote
  #335  
Old 11-26-2007, 02:06 AM
Edge34 Edge34 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Flame Magnet
Posts: 4,830
Default Re: So I\'m going to Prison for 2 years

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
A cop has to have a reason to pull you over

[/ QUOTE ]
"LOL"

[/ QUOTE ]

"LOL" all you want, its cute. However, its true. Even if its something as weak as failing to signal or not coming to a complete stop at a red light when you're going to make a right turn. Save the cutesy "zomg cops have too much power" for another thread, please.

I'm not saying it has to be a STRONG reason, but unless they're at a DUI checkpoint where they basically do everybody, they HAVE to have a reason logged for pulling you over. Simple as that. Keep it on the straight and narrow and don't give them one.
Reply With Quote
  #336  
Old 11-26-2007, 02:08 AM
MuresanForMVP MuresanForMVP is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: out there
Posts: 2,706
Default Re: So I\'m going to Prison for 2 years

And I don't wanna just prove my coordination. I want to prove i'm very capable of operating a vehicle according to the normal MVA standards for receiving a driver's license, with a certain BAC. Therefore I should legally be able to operate an automobile at that level.
Reply With Quote
  #337  
Old 11-26-2007, 02:10 AM
CallMeIshmael CallMeIshmael is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Tis the season, imo
Posts: 7,849
Default Re: So I\'m going to Prison for 2 years

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
*insert Daliman reference*

[/ QUOTE ]

yeah i was talking per mille, which is standard in europe. next time i'll try to remember to convert to american.

[/ QUOTE ]

*insert comment about which country Im in and which country you're in right now*

[/ QUOTE ]

i'm on the internet. where are you?

[/ QUOTE ]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries

[X] America
[ ] The Internet
Reply With Quote
  #338  
Old 11-26-2007, 02:14 AM
MuresanForMVP MuresanForMVP is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: out there
Posts: 2,706
Default Re: So I\'m going to Prison for 2 years

[ QUOTE ]
"LOL" all you want, its cute. However, its true. Even if its something as weak as failing to signal or not coming to a complete stop at a red light when you're going to make a right turn. Save the cutesy "zomg cops have too much power" for another thread, please.

I'm not saying it has to be a STRONG reason, but unless they're at a DUI checkpoint where they basically do everybody, they HAVE to have a reason logged for pulling you over. Simple as that. Keep it on the straight and narrow and don't give them one.

[/ QUOTE ]


"Officer, why did you pull the defendant over?"


"Your honor, it was approximately 1:40am, the bars had just gotten out, they appeared to be of college age, and were driving from the direction of said drinking establishments. Given my years on the force, my experience in situations like this, and the totality of the circumstances, I decided to stop them on the suspicion of drunk driving. When I approached the car, the defendant seemed nervous, and the car smelled of alcohol. I instructed the driver to step out of the car, and I administered a field sobriety test. The defendant did not complete the test to the specific guidelines set forth, and upon receiving a breathalyzer reading of .09 I arrested him for driving under the influence."

Judge: Pwned, guilty.


You'd be surprised, man. You can make a reason out of essentially nothing these days.
Reply With Quote
  #339  
Old 11-26-2007, 02:14 AM
tuq tuq is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: god for Mike Haven
Posts: 13,313
Default Re: So I\'m going to Prison for 2 years

[ QUOTE ]
Cops can almost literally pull you over for any reason, and often do if they know the bars just got out

[/ QUOTE ]
Not "almost" literally.

The most frustrating case of this that I know involved a friend who already had a DUI. He was at a titty bar in Scottsdale, ~15-20 miles from his home in Chandler. He had since become a huge advocate of getting taxis and being safe. Mostly from the law, not from each other, because that's what it's become.

Well the titty bar he was leaving (Babes, for those of you familiar) had parking mostly in the rear, i.e. not visible from the street, thus a vandal's dream. He pulled out of there to go to a laundry <1/2 mile away, and had already called a cab. Well a cop was camped in the parking lot of the antique stores across from the bar and popped him for an illegal turn (by law you must turn into the first lane, he turned into the third lane because he needed to make a fairly immediate left turn...not to mention that loose turns are the #1 indicator of drunk driving).

The reason I know he wasn't BSing was that the turn was away from his home, I used to live right by that laundry, and I know what a zealot he had become. He was putting the public at negligible danger driving on an empty six lane road ~1/3 mile to park his car and get a cab home. But whatever, right? I don't remember his BAC reading but I knew it didn't fall under the extreme rules. To his credit, he tells this story with no apologies and no complaints, and only upon prompting.
Reply With Quote
  #340  
Old 11-26-2007, 02:20 AM
Edge34 Edge34 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Flame Magnet
Posts: 4,830
Default Re: So I\'m going to Prison for 2 years

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Cops can almost literally pull you over for any reason, and often do if they know the bars just got out

[/ QUOTE ]
Not "almost" literally.

The most frustrating case of this that I know involved a friend who already had a DUI. He was at a titty bar in Scottsdale, ~15-20 miles from his home in Chandler. He had since become a huge advocate of getting taxis and being safe. Mostly from the law, not from each other, because that's what it's become.

Well the titty bar he was leaving (Babes, for those of you familiar) had parking mostly in the rear, i.e. not visible from the street, thus a vandal's dream. He pulled out of there to go to a laundry <1/2 mile away, and had already called a cab. Well a cop was camped in the parking lot of the antique stores across from the bar and popped him for an illegal turn (by law you must turn into the first lane, he turned into the third lane because he needed to make a fairly immediate left turn...not to mention that loose turns are the #1 indicator of drunk driving).

The reason I know he wasn't BSing was that the turn was away from his home, I used to live right by that laundry, and I know what a zealot he had become. He was putting the public at negligible danger driving on an empty six lane road ~1/3 mile to park his car and get a cab home. But whatever, right? I don't remember his BAC reading but I knew it didn't fall under the extreme rules. To his credit, he tells this story with no apologies and no complaints, and only upon prompting.

[/ QUOTE ]

No apologies and no complaints. Does it suck that people like that get DUIs? Yeah. I'm glad he had already called a cab and hopefully the issue didn't screw up his insurance or whatever. Keep in mind that obviously different jurisdictions have different regulations. Some places may have more leeway with borderline breathalyzers. Apparently Arizona isn't one of them. Minnesota, the state where nothing is allowed, may have some room for judgment.

So, really, your friend was a victim of the technicality of the law. I will never say EVERY drunk driver is a menace, but if you don't want to only prosecute DUI when they hurt somebody, sometimes there will be people who get pinched on a close call. It happens.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.