Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Two Plus Two > Special Sklansky Forum
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-06-2006, 06:02 AM
David Sklansky David Sklansky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,092
Default Special Thread For Chen-Ankenman Mathematics of Poker

I expect many comments and questions about that book. I'll reply here.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-06-2006, 06:16 AM
goofball goofball is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Who wrote \'help I\'m a bug\' on my letter to grandma?
Posts: 6,463
Default Re: Special Thread For Chen-Ankenman Mathematics of Poker

I've never heard of it. Do you consider it worth reading?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-06-2006, 07:46 AM
alphatmw alphatmw is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,348
Default Re: Special Thread For Chen-Ankenman Mathematics of Poker

[ QUOTE ]
I've never heard of it. Do you consider it worth reading?

[/ QUOTE ] how is this not self explanatory
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-06-2006, 08:01 AM
WelshMackem WelshMackem is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Accrington, UK
Posts: 102
Default Re: Special Thread For Chen-Ankenman Mathematics of Poker

[ QUOTE ]
how is this not self explanatory

[/ QUOTE ]
This, or the thread itself?


Sorry, couldn't resist.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-06-2006, 12:11 PM
Maulik Maulik is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 7,758
Default Re: Special Thread For Chen-Ankenman Mathematics of Poker

DS,

We have a book forum.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-06-2006, 02:45 PM
KCMACK15 KCMACK15 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 5
Default Re: Special Thread For Chen-Ankenman Mathematics of Poker

Mr. Sklansky, I haven't heard of the book, but I do have a question about the mathmatics. I was playing online last night in a cash game at Full Tilt. It was a micro limit. I was dealt three consecutive hands of pocket two's, and on all three consecutive hands I FLOPPED a set. I know many of the readers of this will not believe me but if you would like I do have the room and time down that this occurred. Again these were consecutive hands. I was curious about the probablity of this happening. I did not have the formula or the software to run it, but WE (office) came up with approx. 1 in 8,000,000,000,000,000.
Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
PS thanks for all your great books, they have helped me greatly.
Jeff Mc.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-06-2006, 03:10 PM
mjkidd mjkidd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Supporting Ron Paul!
Posts: 1,517
Default Re: Special Thread For Chen-Ankenman Mathematics of Poker

[ QUOTE ]
Mr. Sklansky, I haven't heard of the book, but I do have a question about the mathmatics. I was playing online last night in a cash game at Full Tilt. It was a micro limit. I was dealt three consecutive hands of pocket two's, and on all three consecutive hands I FLOPPED a set. I know many of the readers of this will not believe me but if you would like I do have the room and time down that this occurred. Again these were consecutive hands. I was curious about the probablity of this happening. I did not have the formula or the software to run it, but WE (office) came up with approx. 1 in 8,000,000,000,000,000.
Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
PS thanks for all your great books, they have helped me greatly.
Jeff Mc.

[/ QUOTE ]

A flopped set 3 times in a row would be (3/51)^3*(1/8.5)^3, or about 3 million to one.

A flopped set of the same rank three times would be (3/51)^3*(4/52)^2*(1/8.5)^3, or about 500 million to one.

A flopped set of deuces three times would be (4/52)^3*(4/52)^3*(1/8.5)^3, or about 6.6 billion to one.

You were only off about 7 orders of magnitude. That's not so much, in the grand scheme of things.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-06-2006, 03:25 PM
David Steele David Steele is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 793
Default Re: Special Thread For Chen-Ankenman Mathematics of Poker

If you are in fact a reliable witness, then the probability is very close to certainty, although very unlikely to occur again. The probability of some other hand sequence amazing you is quite high though.

D.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-06-2006, 03:43 PM
WelshMackem WelshMackem is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Accrington, UK
Posts: 102
Default Re: Special Thread For Chen-Ankenman Mathematics of Poker

That is a superb answer and reminds me of one of Richard Feynman's favourite lecture openers, something along the lines of "I saw a car with registration number MC118GS on the way in to work today, what are the chances of that"
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-06-2006, 05:16 PM
jogsxyz jogsxyz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,167
Default Re: Special Thread For Chen-Ankenman Mathematics of Poker

[ QUOTE ]
That is a superb answer and reminds me of one of Richard Feynman's favourite lecture openers, something along the lines of "I saw a car with registration number MC118GS on the way in to work today, what are the chances of that"

[/ QUOTE ]

Was that your neighbor's car?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.