$18,925 beat - Page 2

PokerBob · #1 11-16-2007, 07:18 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I could beat you

[/ QUOTE ]

Erm no. Schneids can't beat him. We've seen proof.

[/ QUOTE ]

schneids is beneath me.

bonds · #2 11-16-2007, 07:48 PM

[ QUOTE ]

schneids is beneath me.

[/ QUOTE ]

Obviously. It's more fun being on top.

PokerBob · #3 11-16-2007, 07:49 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

schneids is beneath me.

[/ QUOTE ]

Obviously. It's more fun being on top.

[/ QUOTE ]

how do you know?

budblown · #4 11-16-2007, 07:13 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Beat: I lost $18,925 in a 10-hour session in the Commerce 100/200 game.

Brag: In spite of this, none of you could ever beat me. Ever.

[/ QUOTE ]

Variance: Nobody cares because you will probably go back tomorrow.

ShortStack03 · #5 11-16-2007, 07:13 PM

[x] didn't lose a full buy-in

PokerBob · #6 11-16-2007, 07:14 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[x] didn't lose a full buy-in

[/ QUOTE ]

[x] is really [censored] stupid.

ryang · #7 11-16-2007, 07:59 PM

[/ QUOTE ][x] [ ] is really [censored] stupid.

[/ QUOTE ]

FYP

absoludicrous · #8 11-16-2007, 08:17 PM

[x] Better school teacher than poker player
[x] Los Angeles
[ ] Eazy E

bugstud · #9 11-16-2007, 08:24 PM

-$1892.5/hr is probably sustainable. Then again, I don't think I've played in a commerce 1/2 game with more than 15k on me so I don't think I can break this record.

PITTM · #10 11-17-2007, 08:43 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[x] didn't lose a full buy-in

[/ QUOTE ]

[x] is really [censored] stupid.

[/ QUOTE ]

An argument could be made that the fact that you were playing limit is stupider than this man was for thinking you weren't.