Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Televised Poker
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-16-2007, 04:36 PM
Gordon Scott Gordon Scott is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Alabama
Posts: 632
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/15)

[ QUOTE ]
wow... if jamie gold had checked J's full of aces like harman did all you 2p2 nits would be all over him. it was the safe play so congrats to you jen for making the safe play.

it's amazing what you p2prs rage about and the things that you totally miss.

when jen says she's been card dead that's ridiculous. she's only playing the top 2% of starting hands anyway.

ridiculous.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think Jen is proof that even world class players have off days.

FWIW - It seems rudimentary to check in this spot and let the bluff master bet his range which includes everything from 22 to air.

Gold said he wants to go down in history as the greatest bluffer and I think most people just want him to STFU and go away.

GS
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-16-2007, 04:39 PM
JDesab JDesab is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 184
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/15)

i'm sure jen was checking to get a bet from her opponent.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-16-2007, 04:46 PM
JDesab JDesab is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 184
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/15)

if sammy's a lagtard.. what is harman? what's the opposite of lag?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-16-2007, 04:59 PM
jocke4 jocke4 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 98
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/15)

weak tight? [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Nice ep though.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-16-2007, 05:53 PM
Taso Taso is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,098
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/15)

I don't think there is any reason to criticize DN's play. He is at one of the loosest tables ever, he should play tight and he'll get paid off anyways.

That said, I don't really think he's playing tight, I think he's card dead. Considering he called something like $10k with dueces, he's not playing tight. Seems like he's just lacking any pairs, big cards, or connectors. Lots of 93's maybe, and we don't get shown all the cards. Just guessing obviously. He knows how bad the table is, hence "lock the doors!"
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-16-2007, 07:51 PM
Man of Means Man of Means is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 1,244
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/15)

[ QUOTE ]
That said, I don't really think he's playing tight, I think he's card dead. Considering he called something like $10k with deuces,

[/ QUOTE ]

I sorta liked how he played this hand. Stacks were not that deep, so he probably figured if the flop was all baby cards it would be safe to commit vs. Eli's likely two high cards. Plus he has implied odds to stack Eli if he hits a set and Eli make TP. But he did not reraise pf because he'd have a chance to fold if tight players in the blinds (Phil H or Jen) reraised.

When the turn gave him an open-ender...I don't know, I might have thought it would be better to make another bet and protect the pot rather than hope for more value on the river from an Ace.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.