#1
|
|||
|
|||
100NL - too thin?
basically just wonderin about the river. villain is 36/26 over 30 hands and hasnt folded to a cbet yet.
Party Poker - No Limit Hold'em Cash Game - $0.50/$1 Blinds - 5 Players - (LegoPoker Hand History Converter) SB: $73.95 BB: $120.00 UTG: $61.50 CO: $89.45 Hero (BTN): $101.90 Preflop: Hero is dealt A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (5 Players) 2 folds, <font color="red">Hero raises to $3.50</font>, SB calls $3.00, BB folds Flop: ($8) T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players) SB checks, <font color="red">Hero bets $6.00</font>, SB calls $6.00 Turn: ($20) 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players) SB checks, <font color="red">Hero bets $13.50</font>, SB calls $13.50 River: ($47) 4[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (2 Players) SB checks, <font color="red">Hero bets $20.00</font>, <font color="red">SB raises all-in to $50.95</font>, Hero folds Pot Size: $117.95 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100NL - too thin?
the 4 is gorgeous, the [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] not so much. I think this is good though.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100NL - too thin?
if you are going to fold to c/r, you should be checking river
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100NL - too thin?
$20 on the turn. charge those draws.
i really hate this $20 river b/f. either shove it or just check. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100NL - too thin?
id check behind, but if it wasnt [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] id shove.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100NL - too thin?
i agree with shove or check.
bet/fold sucks here because it puts you in a situation to make a big mistake |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100NL - too thin?
[ QUOTE ]
bet/fold sucks here because it puts you in a situation to make a big mistake [/ QUOTE ] he calls the river bet with everything we beat, he raises with everything that beats us. i dont see him doing this with a bluff/worse hand. the only thing shoving does is folds out more hands we beat/commits us against the hands that beat us. is my thinking wrong? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100NL - too thin?
the problem here is that given pot odds on the river you need to be ahead ~20% of the time to make the call.
also comparing to checking behind, you are risking making a $120 mistake, for a potential $20 gain. i cant really be bothered doing the maths, but thats just intuitively bad imo given a good enough read i guess it could potentially be ok, but really: [ QUOTE ] villain is 36/26 over 30 hands [/ QUOTE ] i just hate this |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100NL - too thin?
actually I dont see many hands we beat and he calls.
Same with the shove. What can it force to lay down we dont beat? I would bet more on the turn and check behind in the river. to weak? I would also bet more an the turn. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100NL - too thin?
[ QUOTE ]
if you are going to fold to c/r, you should be checking river [/ QUOTE ] Your too committed to b/f the river |
|
|