Official Stars Regulars Thread

[wpr101]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The fact that Kelsitaan plays a very unorthodox style while lacking many fundamental skills and is still [in my opinion] a big winner makes it even more interesting. His style is best against poor-average players and especially weak-tight players, though, and doesn't stand up well against other thinking, aggressive players. I was never claiming he was an amazing player, just that he was one of the biggest winners at full-ring [at least at 3/6.] I agree that he'd have to develop a lot as a player before he could sustain a decent winrate at 6-max.

[/ QUOTE ]

Kelisitaan is pretty bad. I'm up more against him than anymore else. He might be good against the fish though and nits. He plays 40/26 (this is over 8k hands i have with him) at full ring... it's pretty hard to defend his play.

[/ QUOTE ]

He's tightened up some I think to around 30/20 lately. I admire his small ball strategy but I don't let him get away with the constant min raises.

[/ QUOTE ]

His minraises are really annoying. He's not that bad post flop though. His overall gameplan is poor though.

[Renton]

im up a few buyins on kel. Basically against him you just fight fire with fire and win. You'll have the best hand the vast majority of the time since you'll play tighter, and on top of that he doesn't play well vs aggression.