|
|
#162
08-29-2007, 11:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Play though a hand with me here....
[ QUOTE ]
Pretty clear that you should bet here, probably around $2222ish for the optimal line. [/ QUOTE ] lol r u serious? 
|
|
#163
08-29-2007, 11:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Play though a hand with me here....
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Pretty clear that you should bet here, probably around $2222ish for the optimal line. [/ QUOTE ] lol r u serious? [/ QUOTE ] Can we lock this thread already?
|
|
#164
08-30-2007, 07:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Play though a hand with me here....
I've thought of posting a hand in this manner, because that is the way Harrington presents it. Sometimes I am unsure about decisions I have made on multiple streets.
But I think a time period of 2 days would be sufficient to get enough constructive responses. Stretching it out over 2 years only introduces a lot of noise. I think I might be tempted to bet around 1/2 the pot here on the river. No-one seems to have shown any interest in it and I can't see someone slowplaying all 3 streets. You are getting 2-1 on your bluff and it's not a disaster if you get called. Regarding the Sklansly comment you linked, I disagree with him. I think you should only be thinking about randomizing your play when you are playing against (or are going to be playing against) the same opponents over a long period of time. Harrington gave a rule of thumb, something like your stack has to be more than 24 times the cost of entering the pot to play a speculative hand like a small pocket pair to make up for all the times it misses or you have to throw it away to a raise, etc. I don't remember, though, if he was talking about playing it from EP. Your stack is over 40x the bet (as is the mini-raiser's), so calling is OK for a skilled player, but folding is OK too. I am not that skilled a player, so I would fold. Flop and turn, I would check for reasons many others have stated, so I won't further comment on that.
|
|
#165
10-02-2007, 07:26 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Play though a hand with me here....
[ QUOTE ]
$4000 buy in MTT [/ QUOTE ] Just curious, but why exactly is this in the small stakes forum? If this is small stakes, then whats it take to get in the high stakes forum???
|
|
#166
10-02-2007, 10:14 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Play though a hand with me here....
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] $4000 buy in MTT [/ QUOTE ] Just curious, but why exactly is this in the small stakes forum? If this is small stakes, then whats it take to get in the high stakes forum??? [/ QUOTE ] Seriously. Give it up already. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
|
|
#167
10-02-2007, 09:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Play though a hand with me here....
Wow, this thread is awesome! At this point I'd guess it checks around on the river, EP raiser turns up 3-3 while everyone else mucks with Hero kicking himself for never having taken a stab at it.
|
|
#168
10-03-2007, 12:59 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Play though a hand with me here....
[ QUOTE ]
Just curious, but why exactly is this in the small stakes forum? If this is small stakes, then whats it take to get in the high stakes forum??? [/ QUOTE ] Just a guess, but maybe the forum split since your original post in March 2006.
|
|
#169
10-03-2007, 01:09 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Play though a hand with me here....
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Just curious, but why exactly is this in the small stakes forum? If this is small stakes, then whats it take to get in the high stakes forum??? [/ QUOTE ] Just a guess, but maybe the forum split since your original post in March 2006. [/ QUOTE ] Correct. OP, please stop seeking advice and opinions on this hand. Just say what happened on the river, who showed what, etc., etc. It's really not even that interesting of a hand. Definitely NOT2-years worthy.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
