Open Challenge to 2+2 Community

[jafeather]

[ QUOTE ]
My Credibility is not at stake here

[/ QUOTE ]

I never said it was. I was meaning that you have to have some level of credibility for others to have any initial faith in your claim. Without you providing your piece of "evidence" why would anyone want to look into what you say?

[ QUOTE ]
But consistant patterns do not equate to variance...

[/ QUOTE ]

um....over 10 tourneys, yeah...it almost EXACTLY equals variance...

[ QUOTE ]
OMG..THE MATH IN POKER....MY HEAD WILL EXPLODE.....Dude there's only 52 cards in the deck....don't make it out to the equivalent of solving Fermat's Last Theorem...

[/ QUOTE ]

I am not exaggerating the math in poker to be some grand unsolvable equation. Nor should you simplify it to a level so elementary where 10 tourneys can in any way be considered proof of a long-term pattern. (especially since you won't even cough up 10 HHs to begin analysis of your "theory")


[ QUOTE ]
Why the [censored] is this thread still unlocked?!?!?!?!?!

[/ QUOTE ]

[IWant2Believe]

OK..so what do you need as a proof....?

[Bobo Fett]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Just because the woman who says she was raped happens to be a prostitute does not mean you don't believe what she is saying

[/ QUOTE ]

I feel like you should have elaborated on this in your original post. Shame on you lee jones. [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]
A+

[tailspin4540]

[ QUOTE ]
PERFECT EXAMPLE BELOW..


PokerStars Game #XXXXXXXXX: Tournament #XXXXXXX, $3.00+$0.40 Hold'em No Limit - Level V (75/150) - 2007/10/20 - 01:13:36 (ET)
Table 'xxxxxx' 10-max Seat #10 is the button
Seat 2: player a (3900 in chips)
Seat 4: player B (1210 in chips)
Seat 7: player C (2610 in chips)
Seat 9: Player D(5695 in chips)
Seat 10: Player E (1585 in chips)
Player A: posts small blind 75
Player B: posts big blind 150
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Player E [Qd Th]
Player c: calls 150
player d: calls 150
player e: calls 150
player a: calls 75
player b: checks
*** FLOP *** [9c 3d 2s]
player a: checks
player b: checks
player c: checks
player d: bets 450
player e: folds
player a: folds
player b: raises 610 to 1060 and is all-in
player c: folds
player d: calls 610
*** TURN *** [9c 3d 2s] [2c]
*** RIVER *** [9c 3d 2s 2c] [Qh]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
player B: shows [Ah Ac] (two pair, Aces and Deuces)
player d: shows [Ad 2d] (three of a kind, Deuces)
player d collected 2870 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 2870 | Rake 0
Board [9c 3d 2s 2c Qh]
Seat 2: player a (small blind) folded on the Flop
Seat 4: player b (big blind) showed [Ah Ac] and lost with two pair, Aces and Deuces
Seat 7: player c folded on the Flop
Seat 9: player d showed [Ad 2d] and won (2870) with three of a kind, Deuces
Seat 10: player e (button) folded on the Flop

[/ QUOTE ]

If OP was Player B in this hand it explains so much.

[Devilboy666]

[ QUOTE ]
Play 10 $3.40 10 player SNGs at Pokerstars and come back to say that the site is using a fair RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR. ANyone with any common sense would know that the site is clearly rigging the RNG to make the games go faster so that it can run as many games as possible as soon as possible....

[/ QUOTE ]

Lol are you serious? I've been datamining micro Stars SNGs for years. There's NOTHING unusual there.

[Devilboy666]

[ QUOTE ]
OK..so what do you need as a proof....?

[/ QUOTE ]
Complete HH of at least 100k hands is a good start.

[sethypooh21]

As a srsbiz question...how is THIS the thread that the zoo picks up and runs with today? OP isn't even amusing aside from bizarre punctuation...

[sixfour]

[ QUOTE ]
PERFECT EXAMPLE BELOW..


PokerStars Game #XXXXXXXXX: Tournament #XXXXXXX, $3.00+$0.40 Hold'em No Limit - Level V (75/150) - 2007/10/20 - 01:13:36 (ET)
Table 'xxxxxx' 10-max Seat #10 is the button
Seat 2: player a (3900 in chips)
Seat 4: player B (1210 in chips)
Seat 7: player C (2610 in chips)
Seat 9: Player D(5695 in chips)
Seat 10: Player E (1585 in chips)
Player A: posts small blind 75
Player B: posts big blind 150
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Player E [Qd Th]
Player c: calls 150
player d: calls 150
player e: calls 150
player a: calls 75
player b: checks
*** FLOP *** [9c 3d 2s]
player a: checks
player b: checks
player c: checks
player d: bets 450
player e: folds
player a: folds
player b: raises 610 to 1060 and is all-in
player c: folds
player d: calls 610
*** TURN *** [9c 3d 2s] [2c]
*** RIVER *** [9c 3d 2s 2c] [Qh]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
player B: shows [Ah Ac] (two pair, Aces and Deuces)
player d: shows [Ad 2d] (three of a kind, Deuces)
player d collected 2870 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 2870 | Rake 0
Board [9c 3d 2s 2c Qh]
Seat 2: player a (small blind) folded on the Flop
Seat 4: player b (big blind) showed [Ah Ac] and lost with two pair, Aces and Deuces
Seat 7: player c folded on the Flop
Seat 9: player d showed [Ad 2d] and won (2870) with three of a kind, Deuces
Seat 10: player e (button) folded on the Flop

[/ QUOTE ]

So, players b, d and e are fish, this is perfectly standard at a low limit donk and go, ban OP

[freecard4all]

missing "retard" option

[freecard4all]

[ QUOTE ]
By the way...YOu have to be atleast survive till 5 players are remining..to start noticing the anamolies...

[/ QUOTE ]
LOL LOL LOL and MEGALOL!

When it comes to the bubble game everyone uses proper push-fold strategy. Either based on sw recomendations or on a guesses.
Today everyone knows how to play the bubble. If you think your opponents don't you are wrong.
And if you never used a calculation how to behave you are wrong even more. And lose that bucks quickly.

If you think there wasn't KK vs AJo earlier because you didn't see such a show down you are wrong even more and more.